However, the manner of his
capture,
trial and
termination
is beyond reproach for a nation, which swaggers about pretending to be
a beacon of justice. Has justice been served? Or, was Saddam
essentially whacked by one
powerful crime family asserting its strength over a boastful, operator encroaching on forbidden turf. No offense Saddam. It was only business.
Control of interests is paramount. Americas one time friend and
ally, Saddam Hussein, became dispensable when he ceased to uphold his
part of the bargain. Saddams
failed war against another U.S. demon, Iran, his 1990 invasion into
Kuwait threatening U.S. oil interests, and his
alleged plot to kill
former president George H. W. Bush, sealed the fate of Don Hussein.
He had to go. He had outlived his usefulness. It was in the best
interests of
The Bush Dynasty.
Today, the interests of the Bush clan take precedence over those of the
U.S. With some media encouragement, Bush runs the US government like a
family business.
After a decade of carefully executed
demonizing,
it was easy to sell a gullible U.S. public on the mission to remove
Saddam. Never mind the fact that many of Saddams shockingly oppressive
murders of Iraqi citizens were
sanctioned by the White House which chose to turn a blind eye as long as Saddam served American interests.
When he became less useful, Saddam was
portrayed
as Public Enemy Number One. Overnight, Saddams use of torture,
Geneva Convention banned substances on his own people, and his
possession of and intentions of using weapons of mass destruction were
the
biggest crimes against humanity. What changed? Hadnt those crimes always been heinous?
A good, old-fashioned war was convened, the mission was declared
accomplished, and the bad guy was captured, locked up and made to face justice.
The Pandoras Box of chaos, long held tightly shut under Saddams fist, popped open spilling out anarchy. Pity the
fate of the
coalition of the willing.
No WMDs were found, no rose petals were strewn on the path of the triumphant liberators,
no democracy formed in Iraq and no one in Iraq believes they are safer today than they were before Bushs March 2003 invasion.
Saddam was subjected to a
show trial more in keeping with
Uncle Joe Stalin. Then the US military handed over
physical control of Saddam to the Iraqi government which entity proceeded in thirty minutes to
lynch him. No blood on
U.S. hands!
What corrupt backdoor deals and secrets have been silenced with him?
Well never know. Looks like someone thought it was best to play it
safe and make sure Saddam, the rat, didnt squeal. The interests of The
Dynasty must be protected
oil.
In a pathetic last minute attempt to stave off execution, Saddams
lawyers actually resorted to a desperate plea for mercy to the United States! Unbelievable. Had they not read the statistics on
Texas executions during George W. Bushs
tenure as governor? Was Georges reaction another mocking
please dont kill me? Not only does George talk to God but also he thinks he is
the Old Testament God of vengeance. This is what is so revolting.
Bush has used the furor about the execution to distract the media from
the real issue at hand: his plan to ignore the Iraq Study Group Report
and to escalate the war. In the past Bush has used Saddam to justify a
variety of crimes. Even the Hussein verdict date was
rigged
to help Bushs party in the recent mid-term congressional elections.
How will Bush function without Saddam? Go after Osama bin Laden?
Well, Saddam is gone. For Bush interests, Saddam dead may be
more dangerous
than Saddam alive. For the Sunni minority in Iraq, the memory of Saddam
may become a rallying point. In the Guardian newspaper,
Brian Brivati argues
that Saddams death may well come to be a defining moment in which the
terrorists are given their symbolic martyr to avenge. An evil genocidal
dictator dies and, in death, perhaps becomes more powerful than he ever
was in life.
Being the leader of Iraq has rather lost its charm. Iraqi Prime Minister
Nouri Kamel al-Maliki wants to depart the office as soon as possible. Would you want that job?
Eventually another version of Saddam Hussein will gain sufficient
dictatorial control of Iraq to end the civil war through the exercise
of another iron fist aided by popular, secular support. As long as
American interests are protected, will Washington turn a blind eye to a
new Iraqi dictators brio and send over yet another envoy eager to
shake the hand of the ruler of the new regime? Most likely.
Ironically, that would be a happy ending to the Bush family adventures
in Iraq. Less salubrious prospects such as a protracted Sunni-Shia
fight to the death could spill over into and unsettle other Middle East
countries. And that would be bad for business.
Meanwhile, woe to Americas few remaining friends and allies who fail to serve U.S. and Bush Family interests.
Elizabeth Gyllensvard contributed to and edited this story.