In his early years, Saddam Hussein was on the CIA payroll.
Contacts began in 1959, when the agency sponsored him as a member of a
small team assigned to assassinate Iraqi Prime Minister Abd al-Karim
Qasim. The Prime Minister had made himself a target by committing the
unpardonable sin of taking his nation out of the anti-Soviet Baghdad
Pact. Hussein was set up in an apartment across the street from Qasims
office and told to observe his movements. But CIA plans received a
setback when the attempted assassination on October 7, 1959 was
conducted in so inept a manner that it failed to achieve its objective.
An over-anxious Hussein fired too soon, killing Qasims driver and only
wounding the Prime Minster. Following the botched attempt on the Prime
Ministers life, CIA and Egyptian intelligence agents helped Hussein to
escape to Tikrit. From there he crossed into Syria and then to Beirut,
where the CIA provided him with an apartment and put him through a
short training course. Even at that young age, a former U.S.
intelligence official recalls, Hussein was known as having no class.
He was a thug a cutthroat. But he did have excellent anticommunist
credentials. From Beirut he was eventually sent to Cairo, where he
remained under the watchful eye of his CIA handlers and made frequent
visits to the U.S. embassy to meet with agency officials.
U.S. hostility towards Qasim had not abated, and he was eventually
killed in a Baath Party coup in 1963, after which the CIA gave the
Iraqi National Guard lists of communists they wanted to see imprisoned
and executed. According to former U.S. intelligence officials, many
suspected communists were killed under the personal supervision of
Hussein. As one former U.S. State Department official put it, We were
frankly glad to be rid of them. You ask that they get a fair trial? You
have got to be kidding. This was serious business. With his image
burnished through such accomplishments, Hussein first went on to become
head of Iraqi security and then in 1979, president of the nation. He
remained allied with the U.S. during his first decade in power as he
ordered the arrest of communists and other political opponents by the
thousands. Nearly all would be tortured or killed. (1)
In 1980, Saddam Hussein sent Iraqi troops to invade Iran in an attempt
to seize territory by force of arms. The resulting war dragged on for
eight years, causing immense destruction and costing the lives of 1.7
million people in one of the twentieth centurys worst wars.
Relatively early in that war, in December 1983, President Reagan sent
envoy Donald Rumsfeld to Baghdad to meet Iraqi President Saddam Hussein
and offer American assistance. Rumsfeld told Hussein that the U.S.
wanted full relations and would regard any major reversal of Iraqs
fortunes as a strategic defeat for the West. Just one month before,
State Department official Jonathan Howe had informed Secretary of State
George Schultz that Iraq was using chemical weapons against Iranian
forces on an almost daily basis. It was also well known by then that
the Hussein government was engaging in widespread repression. Many
thousands of individuals were being imprisoned, tortured, executed or
sent into exile.
Howard Teicher worked for the National Security Agency when he
accompanied Rumsfeld on that mission. Teicher recalls, President
Reagan decided that the United States would do whatever was necessary
and legal to prevent Iraq from losing the war with Iran, and
formalized a policy of assisting Iraq in a National Security Decision
Directive [NSDD] which Teicher helped draft. CIA Director William Casey
personally spearheaded the effort to ensure that Iraq had sufficient
military weapons, ammunition and vehicles to avoid losing the Iran-Iraq
war. Pursuant to the secret NSDD, the United States actively supported
the Iraqi war effort by supplying the Iraqis with billions of dollars
of credits, by providing U.S. military intelligence and advice to the
Iraqis, and by closely monitoring third country arms sales to Iraq to
make sure that Iraq had the military weaponry required.
CIA personnel visited Iraq on a regular basis to provide surveillance
intelligence gathered by U.S.-supplied Saudi AWACS planes in support of
the Iraqi war effort. Both the CIA and the Defense Intelligence Agency
directly assisted an Iraqi offensive in February 1988 by electronically
blinding Iranian radar for three days. The United States also
provided strategic operational advice to the Iraqis to better use their
assets in combat, Teicher said. For example, in 1986, President
Reagan sent a secret message through Egyptian President Hosni Mubarek,
acting as an intermediary, to Saddam Hussein telling him that Iraq
should step up its air war and bombing of Iran, and similar strategic
operational military advice was passed to Hussein through meetings
with various heads of state.
Teicher personally attended meetings in which CIA Director Casey and
Deputy Director Robert Gates noted the need for Iraq to have certain
weapons such as cluster bombs and anti-armor penetrators in order to
stave off Iranian attacks. The CIA supplied cluster bombs to Iraq
through Cardoen, a Chilean company.
More than sixty officials of the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency were
involved in the program that not only provided Iraq with intelligence
on Iranian positions, but actually helped Iraq to develop tactical
battle plans as well as plans for air strikes. Although it was well
known by the later stages of the war that Iraqi forces were routinely
using chemical weapons against the Iranians, American support for Iraqi
offensives continued. The use of gas on the battlefield by the Iraqis
was not a matter of deep strategic concern, recalled a former
high-ranking Defense Intelligence Agency official. U.S. leaders were
more interested in ensuring the defeat of Iran. The Pentagon wasnt so
horrified by Iraqs use of gas, remembered a former official involved
in the program. It was just another way of killing people whether
with a bullet or phosgene, it didnt make any difference.
Saddam Hussein received unstinting support throughout his war with
Iran. His crimes were never an issue. Not, that is, until he
miscalculated and invaded Kuwait in 1990 in another attempted
land-grab. This war, however, was not on the U.S. agenda, and Husseins
reckless action triggered an attack by the U.S. and Great Britain,
along with the imposition of UN sanctions. (2)
That Saddam Hussein was once regarded as a friend of the West is rarely
mentioned these days. As long as he directed internal repression and
external wars at those U.S. policy makers loathed, he could count on
support. It was only when his actions went against U.S. interests that
he was suddenly transformed into a tyrant and criminal. His methods had
not changed. Only the Western perception of him had shifted, because he
no longer served the purposes of global capital.
The U.S. did much to create Saddam Hussein and others like him. It is
impossible to avoid concluding that the trial of Saddam Hussein was
little more than a case of selective justice, meant to provide
post-justification for an invasion that was itself a grave violation of
international law. Saddam Husseins crimes were real enough, but those
acts would never have brought him to trial had he continued to operate
within the parameters sketched for him by the West. The trail of Saddam
Hussein is hailed as a triumph of justice, despite the fact that it was
initiated and guided by an occupying power. Yet one wonders. Who will
judge the Western powers that stand in judgment?
Gregory Elich is the author of
Strange Liberators: Militarism, Mayhem, and the Pursuit of Profit
http://www.amazon.com/Strange-Liberators-Militarism-Mayhem-Pursuit/dp/1595265708
He is on the Board of Directors of the Jasenovac Research Institute and
on the Advisory Board of the Korea Truth Commission. His articles have
appeared in newspapers and periodicals across the world, including the
U.S., Canada, South Korea, Great Britain, France, Zimbabwe, Yugoslavia,
Russia, Denmark and Australia.