Pacific Free Press was launched in March 2007 by Dutch-Canadian Richard
Kastelein of V.O.F. Expathos, in the Netherlands along with Chris Cook- CFUV radio journalist and Editor in Chief of Pacific Free Press. Cook is based in , Victoria, British Columbia.
The mission of Pacific Free Press is simple: to dig out nuggets of truth from
the slag-heap of lies, ignorance and witless diversion that has buried
public discourse today. Pacific Free Press provides a new venue for
disseminating hard news and insightful, fact-based analysis of the
harsh realities too often ignored or distorted by the mainstream press.
The Lebanese government has nearly doubled the size of its security forces in recent months by adding about 11,000 mostly Sunnis and Christian troops, and has armed them with weapons and vehicles donated by the UAE, a Sunni state.
(Lebanon Builds Up Security Forces, Megan Stack, LA Times)
The armys conclusion is that a war in the near future is a reasonable possibility .the IDFs operative assumption is that during the coming summer months, a war will break out against Hezbollah and perhaps against Syria as well. Haaretz editorial
When Hezbollah puts a million people on the streets of Beirut, it doesnt appear on the front page of the New York Times. That spot is reserved for Bushs made-in-Washington extravaganzas like the Cedar, Orange or Rose revolutions. Those bogus revolutions were cooked up in American think tanks and engineered by US NGOs; thats why they got headline coverage in the Times. The Beirut demonstrations dont promote the political agenda of the Americas ruling elite, so theyre stuck on page 8 where theyll be ignored.
Some things never change.
But the demonstrations are an important part of the drama
which is currently unfolding in the region. They signal the shifting of
power away from Washington and Tel Aviv to a new Shiite-dominated
Middle East. The American-backed government of Fouad Siniora is the
next domino on the list which could fall in a matter of weeks. Time
appears to be running out for Siniora and theres nothing Bush or
Olmert can do about it.
Hezbollah leader, Hassan Nasrallah, is moving Lebanon towards
"democratization" by demanding greater representation for the countrys
majority, the Shiites. So far, hes decided to take the peaceful
route, but the massive protests are an impressive show of force that
could be a sign of things to come. If the situation deteriorates,
Hezbollah will do what is necessary to defend its people and its
interests. Siniora knows that Nasrallah has the power to bring down the
government or to plunge the country into civil war. So, it's all a
matter of who blinks first.
Ironically, Nasrallahs tactics mirror those that were used during the
so-called Cedar Revolution which put Siniora in office and forced the
Syrian troops out of Lebanon. Now, the situation has reversed itself
and tens of thousands of mostly poor Shiites have set up camp in
Bieruts main square, the Riad el Soloh, and are hunkering-down for the
long haul. There defiance is as much an indication of class struggle as
it is a rejection of the Siniora government.
Megan Stack of the LA
Times clarifies this point:
Some of the poorest and most marginalized people in the country,
Shiite Muslims, have abandoned their homes in suburban slums to camp
out on the nation's priciest bit of real estate. Though they often have
trudged through Lebanese history as war refugees, now they have managed
to displace Lebanon's wealthiest shop owners. They also have surrounded
Prime Minister Fouad Siniora, barricaded in his office.
Class struggle is a big part of the present confrontation. The media
has tried to emphasize the religious differences to promote their
theory of a clash of civilizations; the ongoing struggle between
modernity and Arab reactionaries. Its all the same gibberish Americans
read every day in op-ed columns by Tom Friedman, David Brooks or the
other neocon scribes.
The clash of civilizations theory is a great boon to those who would
like see war in the Middle East continue into perpetuity or at least
until every Arab country is broken up into little defenseless statlets.
But the truth is that the Shiites are mostly poor and underrepresented
and are entitled to a bigger place at the political table. Does that
mean they would have the right to veto legislation? (which seems to
be the main bone of contention)
Yes, of course, if they are in the majority, but that doesnt imply
that the Lebanon is destined to become an Islamic theocracy. Nasrallah
has already dismissed the idea of an Iranian-type Mullahocracy, run
by Ayatollahs who strictly apply Sharia Law. Nasrallah is fiercely
nationalistic despite his clerical robes. His main objective is to
remove the US-Israeli agents, like Siniora, from the government and
reestablish Lebanese sovereignty. Remember, Siniora refused to even
deploy the Lebanese army to fight the Israelis when they invaded his
country and killed 1300 Lebanese nationals. For the hundreds of
thousands of victims in the south, theres no doubt as to where
Sinioras true loyalties lie.
Siniora is Washingtons man. In fact, he even kept the lines of
communication open with Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, while his
country was being bombed with American ordinance dropped from Israeli
planes. After the war he quickly reopened the US embassy even though
his countrys infrastructure was still in ruins from Israels 34 Day
rampage. He has been a great asset to US-Israeli plans to create a New
Middle East, but utterly useless for the great body of
poverty-stricken and homeless Lebanese civilians.
Michel Chossudovsky summarized the administrations goals in Lebanon this way:
Washingtons objective is to transform Lebanon into a US protectorate.
The Lebanese people are demanding the resignation of a government which
is acting on behalf of the US and Israeli invaders of their country.
They are demanding the formation of a national unity government which
will defend the Lebanese homeland against US-Israeli aggression.
Chossudovsky adds:
The Beirut government is taking orders directly from the US embassy.
The Siniora government has allowed the deployment of NATO forces on
Lebanese territory under the pretext of UN-sponsored peace-keeping
operation. NATO warships under German command are stationed off the
countrys eastern Mediterranean coastline. NATO has a military
cooperation agreement with Israel. (Mass Demonstrations against the
US-backed Lebanese Government Michel Chossudovsky; Global Research)
The US and Israel are working feverishly behind the scenes to
destabilize Lebanon as part of their broader plans for the entire
region. The assassination of Lebanese Industry Minister, Pierre Gemayel
can only be understood in this larger context. The assassination
strengthened the US-Israel position vis a vis Syria and increased the
likelihood of a confrontation between Hezbollah and government forces.
This is precisely what Israel wants. It allows Tel Aviv to stay
uninvolved while their 34 Day War resumes via their Lebanese proxies.
Megan Stack of the LA Times reports:
The Lebanese government has
nearly DOUBLED the size of its security forces in recent months by
adding about 11,000 mostly Sunnis and Christian troops, and has armed
them with weapons and vehicles donated by the UAE, a Sunni state.
(Lebanon Builds Up Security Forces, LA Times)
"The dramatic increase in the Interior Ministry troops, including the
creation of a controversial intelligence unit and the expansion of a
commando force, is meant to counter the growing influence of Iran and
Hezbollah, its Shiite ally in Lebanon The quiet, speedy buildup
indicates that Lebanons anti-Syria ruling majority, has been bracing
for armed sectarian conflict since the withdrawal of Syrian forces in
the spring of 2005. It also reflects growing tensions across the region
between US-allied Sunnis Muslims who hold power in most Arab nations
and the increasingly Shiite-ruled Iran and Hezbollah. (LA Times)
The Siniora government has actually moved troops out of the army into
the Internal Security Forces (ISF). The implication is clear. Siniora
has no interest in defending his country from foreign (Israeli)
invasion; hes simply getting ready to fight his own people. Clearly,
the weapons from the United Arab Emirates are being provided under
Bushs authority to help Siniora in a future confrontation with
Hezbollah.
Mark Mackinnon of the Globe and Mail confirms much of what appeared in
the LA Times.
Mackinnon says,
Since the Syrian armys departure from
Lebanon in early 2005, the US and France have been providing money and
training to the Internal Security Forces (ISF). With the political
situation souring further in recent weeks, the UAE stepped in to
provide the unit with an emergency gift of thousands of rifles and
dozens of police vehicles. (West helps Lebanon build Militia to fight
Hezbollah; Globe and Mail)
Even though Sinioras troops have been armed and trained by western
powers, Israel is still not confident that they can prevail. In fact,
Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported:
The mounting crisis threatening the Siniora government in Lebanon, and
the specter of a Hezbollah takeover, have spurred senior Israeli
government officials in Jerusalem to raise several proposals in recent
days aimed at strengthening Siniora .(They are) increasingly concerned
that Sinioras government will fall, resulting in a Hezbollah takeover
that would turn the country into what an Israeli government official
source termed the first Arab state to become an Iranian protectorate.
But Israeli fears may be unwarranted. While Hezbollah receives military
assistance from Iran, it certainly does not compare to the high-tech
weaponry and foreign aid that Israel gets from the US. Nor is there any
indication that Hezbollah is merely a puppet of the Iranian Mullahs.
This is just more baseless scaremongering. In fact, a strong
nationalist government in Beirut could serve to stabilize the region by
developing a more credible deterrent to Israeli aggression. (Israel has
invaded Lebanon 4 times in 25 years) That might undermine Israels
regional ambitions but, it would be infinitely better for the Israeli
citizens who simply want peace and security.
Nevertheless, Israel is preparing for any eventuality; especially since
it is unlikely that Bush will be able to commit any American troops if
war breaks out. Haaretz summarized the somber mood of the Israeli
high-command in an editorial earlier in the week:
The armys conclusion is that a war in the near future is a reasonable
possibility. As Amir Oren reported several weeks ago, the IDFs
operative assumption is that during the coming summer months, a war
will break out against Hezbollah and perhaps against Syria as well.
But there is room for optimism. By summer, the Bush administration
should be winding down in Iraq. This is bound to have a profound effect
on the entire region. Israel will be less likely to restart its war
with Lebanon if the administration is engaged in fragile negotiations
with the neighboring states. And, who knows; a phased withdrawal of
troops in Iraq might force a compromise in the Israel-Palestine
standoff? (Olmert has already begun talking to Saudi Arabia about a
comprehensive peace plan modeled on the Road Map)
So far, only one thing seems certain; that US-Israeli influence will
steadily decline just as Shiite power continues to rise. Another
bloodbath in Lebanon wont change that reality.