Home     The Writers     Search     Submissions     Contact Us     Gorilla Radio     Atlantic Free Press     Empire Burlesque  
  You are here: 

Fri

17

Oct

2008

Palin's Cavity Between the Ears
Written by Chris Genovali   
Friday, 17 October 2008 17:29
smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon
Drill Baby Drill
by Chris Genovali
Victoria’s Times-Colonist writer Iain Hunter’s recent column on John McCain’s vice-presidential pick Sarah Palin (“Our election needs Palin’s feistiness,” September 8, 2008) exemplifies the type of feckless punditry plaguing so much of the United States election coverage. As for Hunter’s wish that the “feisty” Palin was “running for high political office in Canada,” let’s just say that one man’s feistiness is another man’s fanaticism.
 
Alaska governor Sarah Palin is really more frightening than fiesty

It is exactly the cynical circus sideshow surrounding the manufactured Palin phenomenon that we should do everything in our power to avoid with regard to Canada’s electoral process.
 
 
Hunter pines for Canadian candidates cut out of the same extremist cloth as Palin because it will make for more entertaining elections, but what he fails to acknowledge is that we already have plenty of Sarah Palins in this province and country at all levels of government; the only thing that separates the two is that ours tend not to frame their assault on the environment by invoking god or leading convention halls full of rabid followers in chants of “drill baby drill.”

Here is what British Columbians need to know about Governor Palin that Hunter’s column unfortunately side-stepped:

Palin is an anti-science creationist and oilindustry sycophant who believes god wants all manner of fossil-fuel development to carry forth in her state. She supports oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and Alaska’s offshore region. In an interview with CNBC, Palin also enthused how:
  • “there’s trillions of cubic feet of natural gas . . . that need to be tapped . . . known reserves of natural gas up on our North Slope.”

Palin does not believe climate change is due to anthropogenic causes, as she revealed to CBS news anchor Katie Couric:
  • “I’m not going to solely blame all of man’s activities on changes in climate because the world’s weather patterns are cyclical, and over history we have seen changes there. But it kinda doesn’t matter at this point in the debate what caused it.”
 
But as U.S. News & World Report blogger Maura Judkis points out: 
  • “Well, kinda, it does matter. Because knowing and caring about the cause of a problem help us determine the solution—whether it’s climate change or anything else that affects our country.”
And while Palin is now admitting that climate change is “real,” her deliberate inertia on the issue positions her amongst the denier fringe. University of Alaska professor Rick Steiner recently pointed out in the Seattle Post-Intelligencer that while:
  • “Alaska is ground zero in the crisis of global warming, Palin has done virtually nothing to address the problem . . . Lots of talk, no action. Although in the past two years the Arctic summer sea ice shrunk to the lowest levels ever recorded, Palin apparently does not believe it is human-induced or cause for alarm.”

When it comes to wildlife policy, Palin ranks with the most notorious political neanderthals that any North American jurisdiction has ever seen hold elected office. An enthusiastic proponent of aerial gunning of wolves and bears, Palin has instituted a bounty that rewards airborne shooters with $150 in cash for each left foreleg they turn in from freshly killed wolves.

Palin’s persecution of wolves is being carried out for the ill-conceived purpose of “managing for ungulates,” which is ostensibly designed to increase trophy-hunting opportunities of elk and moose. Lethal predator control is unsound as a long-term management tool and has a dubious record of success as a means of depressing numbers of wolves over time. Gordon Haber, a wildlife scientist who has studied canis lupus in Alaska for 43 years, commenting on Palin’s war on wolves in a salon.com article this month, stated that “I cannot find credible scientific data to support their arguments.”

As far as endangered species are concerned, Palin is equally disdainful of scientific evidence. Ignoring her own state scientists, Palin adamantly opposes putting the polar bear on the endangered-species list. In fact, her opposition to the listing is so vehement that under her direction Alaska is suing the United States federal government to stop it from occurring.

The London Telegraph is reporting that Palin has:
  • “used the work of scientists known to be skeptical about global warming in an effort to stop polar bears being protected as an endangered species” and that “a number of the scientists who wrote a paper cited by Palin also allegedly have links to the oil industry.”
 
The Telegraph also reports that the lawsuit opposes the endangered listing in part:
  • “because it would deter activities such as . . . oil and gas exploration and development while it would also impede the building of an Alaskan natural gas pipeline,” a $40 billion mega-project Palin has claimed as being the “will of God.” Palin also continues to fight the listing of beluga whales in Cook Inlet which, like her polar-bear battle, is being carried out at the behest of Big Oil.

But it isn’t just large carnivores and marine mammals that Palin holds in contempt—she apparently doesn’t think wild salmon need much protection either. The pristine Bristol Bay watershed contains one of the most productive Sockeye salmon rivers in the world and Palin supports establishing the world’s largest open-pit gold and copper mine at its headwaters.

From the Alaskan conservation group Save Bristol Bay:
  • “The Pebble Partnership wants to create one of North America’s largest open-pit gold-copper mega mines. The Pebble Mine complex, covering some 15 square miles, would include the largest dam in the world, larger than Three Gorges Dam in China, made of earth not concrete, to hold back the toxic waste created in the mining process. Over its lifetime, Pebble will produce 2.5 billion tons of waste.”

In short, when it comes to the environment Palin is what can only be termed a “paleo-conservative.” A McCain-Palin administration would potentially be even worse for the planet than the Bush-Cheney debacle of the last eight long years, which has arguably been the ultimate anti-environmental presidency in the history of the United States.
 
 
 
 
Chris Genovali is the executive director of Raincoast Conservation.
 

 
 
Comments (4)Add Comment
...
written by John Lloyd Scharf, October 18, 2008
Your talents are wasted on fiction. You should try writing news.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +4
...
written by genovali, October 18, 2008
Here's an idea where John Lloyd Scharf (rabid McCain supporter/internet
troll) is coming from (scroll down to the 6th comment):

http://www.johnmccain.com/Blog/Read.aspx?guid=f6728592-44f0-49ee-ab51-0f5518
7eb597
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1
Well written article!
written by jillian, October 20, 2008
Your article points out the many sad and awful facts about Governor Sarah Palin.

Sarah Palin is the most inexperienced, uneducated, amoral and corrupt right wing extremist candidate that this country has ever seen. Hopefully she'll be the last of her kind!
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
So You'd Rather Have Chairwoman Pelosi's Ponzi Program
written by John Lloyd Scharf, February 21, 2009


Spending without taxing forces printing money. Printing money causes inflation.

If you are willing to vote for this package, then if it does not work you should be able to take a cut in salary. For a U.S. Representative or Senator, it should be their whole salary if their State or District fails to have the jobs materialize in their area.

The low end claimed for the Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) is 3 million jobs. That is about one job for every 101 people in a nation of 305 million people.

In the House of Representatives there are 435 US Representatives who vote and 6 who do not vote that represent the Territories that are not States. That is about 691,609 people each for 441 who represent the people of the States and territories.

So, that means about 6917 for each District. In Oregon, there are five Congressional Districts. That would mean at least 35,580 jobs for Oregon, if you figure it that way.

If you look at the total population again, 305 million, Oregon is 3.8 million of that or one in every 81 U.S. citizens. If you divide that 3 million jobs by 81, that means Oregon should get at least 37,037 jobs from ARRA. One of the Oregon U.S. Representatives is claiming we will get 44,000 jobs from this spending, so this seems fair.

It sounds helpful, too, when we have about 180,000 unemployed in Oregon. . That 180,000 is twice the unemployment of a good economy, so we need to reduce to 90,000 unemployed.

However, let's just hold the Representative to the 37,037 jobs. That would mean this ARRA should bring the unemployment down to 143,000. So, if we are at that low end by the end of the year, the Representatives who voted for ARRA should be able to keep their salary and job. Otherwise....

However, remember that one in 81 figure. The ARRA costs $787 billion. That means ARRA is costing Oregon $9,716,049,382 to get 37037 jobs or $262,232 per job.

Can't we get a better deal than that? If we paid workers to just build windmills at $62,232 per worker, including wages and benefits, that would be a very good deal for the workers.They would still have wages of $42,000 after paying for benefits.

Yet, it would leave $200,000 left over for those roads and bridges we need. But even if we just built windmills, it would be a better use of our money. You can install at least three sizeable wind generators for $200,000. Imagine 37,000 windmiills and 37,000 people employed for a year.

Would you rather have? The "Stimulus Plan" of Congress? Or mine?

Write the Whitehouse Here.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
smaller | bigger

busy
 
Top