tocks
rebounded Thursday after the previous session's big drop, with
investors eager to take advantage of bargains! Citibank draws on
$7.3 BILLION of bank lines of credit! At the same some are arguing
that the economic crisis is over. Huh?
A rise in jobless claims and a drop in a key forecasting
gauge provided the latest evidence that the U.S. economy is faltering
and may be slipping into recession.
The Conference Board, a
business-backed research group, said Thursday that its index of leading
economic indicators fell in February for the fifth consecutive month.
The index, which is designed to forecast where the nation's economy is
headed in the next three to six months, dipped 0.3 percent to 135.0 in
February after slumping 0.4 percent the month before.
In
Washington, meanwhile, the Labor Department said that applications for
unemployment benefits totaled 378,000 last week. That was an increase
of 22,000 from the previous week and the highest level in nearly two
months.
The four-week average for new claims rose to 365,250,
which was the highest level since a flood of claims caused by the 2005
Gulf Coast hurricanes
- "Bear
closed at $57 on Thursday and closed at $30 on Friday. To add insult to
injury, they were sold to J P Morgan for $2 a share over the weekend.
- "On
Thursday the stock had a market cap of 6.7 billion dollars. At the
close on Friday that figure was 3.54 billion. At $2 per share the
market cap is 236 million dollars.
- "I'll bet you can't find an
investment institution anywhere that even owned one share of this stock
(tongue in cheek). 6.7 billion billion dollars went poof and it only
took one business day (weekends don't count)! Bear Sterns is a real
dynamite stock, just look at the damage."
CNN: Brokers who lie, and more subprime nightmares (CNN.com)
Many
homeowners who were subject to predatory lending practices - including
brokers who misrepresented payments - are trying to rework their loans.
Few are having any luck.
Report: Citigroup to slash 2,000 jobs
Citigroup plans to lay off 2,000 more bankers and traders before the end of the month, according to The New York Times.
FBI AT WORK - FROM HOUSING PANIC BLOG:
The
list of corporate fraud investigations focused on subprime mortgage
lending practices by major banks and companies has grown since January,
when the bureau announced a probe of 14 mortgage lenders.
While
the bureau will not comment on the companies that are under
investigation, two Justice Department officials confirmed to ABC News
reports in last week's Wall Street Journal that Countrywide Financial
is under investigation.
Primary Unlikely in Michigan, Obama On The Economy
AP:
The Michigan State Senate has adjourned without taking up a
presidential primary bill, essentially ending Michigan's chances of
holding a June 3 do-over Democratic election.
While there still
is a possibility a last-minute deal can be reached, lawmakers' lack of
enthusiasm for a second election paid for by private donors means
that's unlikely.
Hillary Rodham Clinton supports another primary as a way to get Michigan delegates seated at her party's national convention.
But Barack Obama's campaign has raised a host of concerns."
OBAMA BLAMES WAR FOR OIL PRICE HIKE
CHARLESTON,
W.Va. - Barack Obama blamed the Iraq war for higher oil prices and
skyrocketing debt Thursday as he sought to tie the unpopular war to the
slumping economy in working-class West Virginia.
The Democratic
hopeful is trying to cut into Hillary Clinton's base in West Virginia.
The state's demographics appear to favor Clinton, whose support is
strongest among older white voters and blue-collar workers.
MEDIA TENOR'S WEEKLY REPORT ON MEDIA AND CAMPAIGN
Media Tenor studies hundreds of media sources and reports on how the media is or is not covering the candidates:
Media Tenor Presidential Campaign Watch
Obama
fights back - but race issue undermines his act; Leadership proves to
be Obama's Achilles' heel; Recession in reporting - if not in words
New
York, March 20, 2008: Barrack Obama is fighting for the survival of his
campaign. Up-to-data analysis of political coverage in US TV news shows
a collapse of media support for Barrack Obama after the revelation of
the divisive remarks from his long-term spiritual mentor, the Rvd.
Jeremiah Wright. "Although Obama fought back with his speech in
Philadelphia," explains Roland Schatz, President of Media Tenor
International, "the discussion has undermined his claim to transform
race relations in the US." At the same time, analysis of political
coverage in ABC, CBS, NBC and Fox news, shows Hillary Clinton
reclaiming lost ground after her win in Texas.
TV coverage of
the Democratic nomination continues to focus on campaigning and
leadership issues - which more and more evolve into Obama's Achilles'
heel. Doubts about his lack of experie nce have haunted him since the
beginning of the campaign, but they have been balanced by the momentum
of his early wins. But after his failure to beat Clinton in Texas,
criticism prevails. In March, more than 1 in 4 statements on Obama's
leadership qualities was negative. The latest setbacks at the polls
have driven critical reporting about Obama, while Hillary Clinton
profited from her comeback. "As none of the two contenders is expected
to win a majority of delegates, journalists anticipate advantages for
Clinton," Schatz points out.
Negative TV coverage of the economy
reached a new peak in March. As the financial meltdown on Wall Street
continues, politicians struggle to maintain an optimistic outlook,
while more than 70% of Americans see their country already in a
recession. However, the economic problems have had little impact on the
Presidential campaign. But when TV reported about the economic policies
of the candidates, critical comments prevailed. "It see ms unlikely
that one of the contenders can turn the economic upheavals into an
advantage," concludes Schatz.
For the third time, International
Media analysis company Media Tenor is offering a detailed analysis of
the U.S. presidential campaign. TV news coverage of the leading
Presidential contenders is scrutinized at a detailed level. "The
methodology was developed 15 years ago and has been successfully used
not only to analyze the 2000 and 2004 U.S. Presidential campaigns, but
also for International politics as well," Schatz explains.
Media
Tenor's Presidential Campaign Watch focuses not only on Candidate
standings, but also on topics and sources, while adding on an
international perspective.
IN THESE TIMES: DAVID MOBERG; WHAT IS OBAMANOMICS?
http://inthesetimes.com/article/3560/obamanomics/
Who
knows what his economic policies are?" asks one sympathetic economist
from a union that has not yet endorsed a candidate. "They seem pretty
unformed."
Obama would certainly shift government priorities to
improving job prospects and raising living standards for American
workers. He proposes raising the minimum wage to $9.50 an hour,
offering refundable $4,000 tax credits for college, expanding the
childcare tax credit, reforming bankruptcy laws, rebuilding
infrastructure, establishing a new employee savings plan and investing
in alternative energy to create "millions of new green jobs."
Yet
even the unions that have endorsed Obama-including most members of
Change to Win-have found it hard to differentiate his economic policies
from those of Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.)
"I had until
recently felt that both Clinton and Obama campaigns were quite
economically conservative," says Thomas Palley, a progressive economic
consultant and writer. "But the Obama campaign does seem more a
work-in-progress and, therefore, more open to influence."
Campaigns
often fail to foretell presidential policies. Centrist candidate
Franklin Roosevelt shifted to the left. Centrist candidate Bill Clinton
shifted to the right.
The candidate's advisers offer limited
clues. The Guardian's Daniel Koffler tags Obama as a "left
libertarian," reflecting the influence of economic advisers like Austan
Goolsbee from the University of Chicago-the Vatican of the free market
fundamentalists. The work of Obama's advisers suggests that he would
rely on marginal tinkering with markets and incentives to try to
achieve some progressive ends, such as more equality or opportunity.
Such
a strategy would be consistent with what Cass Sunstein, Obama's
colleague at the University of Chicago Law School, identifies as
Obama's "minimalist" approach to law and politics. As Sunstein argued
in The New Republic, Obama would be inclined to make modest adjustments
in institutions in search of his "visionary" goals.
SCOOTER DISBARRED
WASHINGTON
(Reuters) - Lewis "Scooter" Libby, the former chief of staff to Vice
President Dick Cheney, was stripped of his ability to practice law on
Thursday as a result of his conviction in the CIA leak case.
The
former White House aide was found guilty a year ago of obstruction of
justice and lying. Those are considered crimes involving "moral
turpitude" that under the law require disbarment, the District of
Columbia Court of Appeals ruled.
The court had previously
suspended Libby from the practice of law in Washington. President
George W. Bush in July commuted Libby's 2-1/2-year prison sentence,
enraging Democrats who accused Bush of abusing his power.
A
federal jury in Washington convicted Libby of lying and obstructing an
investigation into who blew the cover of CIA officer Valerie Plame,
whose husband, former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, had criticized the Iraq
war.
Libby had not been charged with leaking Plame's identity to
the news media. But Plame said the unmasking destroyed her career and
was retaliation after her husband accused the Bush administration of
manipulating intelligence to build its case for the Iraq war.
The
local Board on Professional Responsibility had recommended that Libby
be disbarred, the court said in its brief order. It said Libby has not
opposed his disbarment."
[Sorry, I don't seem to be able to embed links.]
Editor Greg Mitchell Speaks Out About the Press and the War
First a report on a protest at the American Petroleum Institute in Washington by David Swanson (see afterdowningstreet.org.api)
This
tongue-in-cheek press advisory preceded Wednesday's action in front of
the American Petroleum Institute in Washington, D.C.:
American Petroleum Institute To Grant Congress Permission to Stop Funding Iraq War and Occupation
The
activist group No War, No Warming today announced that they will be
celebrating outside the headquarters of the American Petroleum
Institute Wednesday morning beginning at 8:30 a.m. The API is located
at 1220 L St. NW, at the corner of 13th and L.
Activists will be
celebrating the expected announcement by API that it is changing its
name to the Alternative Power Institute. Its first act as the new API
is anticipated to be the notification of every member of the United
States House and Senate whom it has legally bribed in recent years
that, in light of API's just announced transition to promotion of
renewable energy technologies, there is no further requirement to fund
the occupation of Iraq.
Activists will also be distributing API
tax rebate coupons to pedestrians and car drivers. The tax rebate will
be partial compensation for the approximately $3800 paid by each
taxpayer since 2003 for the Iraq war and federal subsidies to Big Oil.
The
action at the newly-named Alternative Power Institute is one of a
number of actions in Washington, D.C. on March 19th being coordinated
by United for Peace and Justice (
www.5yearstoomany.org).
VIEW FROM THE NATION ON THE WAR
President
Bush's defense of the "success" of his war in Iraq yesterday made a
mockery of the lives lost as the world marked the fifth anniversary of
this quagmire. Both Obama and Clinton took Bush to task for his
revisionism, callousness and incompetence
MEDIA AND THE WAR: A TALK WITH GREG MITCHELL
Greg
Mitchell is the Editor of Editor & Publisher, the trade journal of
America's newspapers. The magazine reports on the newspaper business,
chronicles who owns who and who's working there. It is a credible
source of information read by editors and publishers nationwide.
Mitchell
is not like the usual "business reporter." He writes a widely read
column about the issues of journalism and the challenges facing the
profession. He has carefully tracked reporting on the war in the
mainstream press and emerged as a leading critic of the industry he
serves. He's a thoughtful and clear writer and clearly a man of
conscience and values. His concerns are well documented and detailed.
You would expect that his "insider" voice would be listened to and
might influence the way the war is being covered.
He believes
that it has affected some of the issues that are covered, and perhaps
the way they are covered but really the way the press works.
He thought that they would have that impact.
No
such luck. Back in two years ago, he tried to publish a collection of
his articles but could not find a publisher (an experience I can relate
to.) He was told that the war would soon be over and thus the book
would be dated and passe Clearly that didn't happen. Thanks to Union
Square Press, that book came out for the fifth anniversary of the war.
It's called 'SO WRONG FOR SO LONG: How the Press, the Pundits and the
President Failed on Iraq.'
The book was compelling enough to get Bruce
Springsteen, himself a war critic with such songs as "Who will Be The
Last To Die?" to write a short preface.
I have been plugging the
book perhaps because I never felt my two volumes on the media war
Embedded and When News Lies received the attention they deserved.
Reviews were scarce and few newspapers took up the concerns they raised.
I figured Greg's book would have much more impact because he is "one of
them" and I've gone from insider to outside.
Guess what? That
hasn't been the case. While it has had attention in the blogs and
online, while Bill Moyers has been attentive, most of his colleagues in
the mighty (or, rather, increasingly not so mighty MSM) have not paid
attention to it. More importantly, they don't even seem aware of the
power of the press or willing themselves to assess its impact.
Greg
is not a loud mouth like me, so he is very quiet about his
disappointment. "You would think the New York Times would write about
the impact of the press, but they haven't," he told me. Why won't they,
I kept pressing. "I don't know" he kept responding. He was especially
upset about the fact that on this fifth anniversary of the war, there
have been no pieces on the way the media has covered the war. He noted
that the cable channels, especially have a disproportionate influence
He
also reminded me that the New York Times and Washington Post never
really apologized for coverage that was proven to be demonstrably
wrong. They pointed to the problems, he said, but the conclusion tended
to be we are only as good as our sources.
I felt the book does
not go far enough in inducting the industry. I think that there are
media crimes that contribute to war crimes. I felt he could have done
more to talk about the role of new media but, then again, his focus has
to be the industry he covers.
Greg Mitchell deserves our thanks
for his persistence and commitment to telling the truth and urging
others to do so. That's what "the Boss" sees in the book. I recommend
that you read it as one contribution to the literature on why war has
been such an ongoing disaster. Greg, incidentally also wrote a book
about the late and great populist muckraker Upton Sinclair. I asked him
about the film "There will be blood" supposedly based on his great book
"Oil." Read the book was his reply.
Instead, the wire service claims it's just giving
its members what they want "in an area of growing interest" because it
"makes good business sense". Certainly, the AP is under intense
financial pressure during these doomed celebrities Dow Jones newswires
just announced it'll stop using AP stories after failing to agree on a
price after more than a year of negotiations. Clearly, the AP now
thinks that Hollywood coverage can become its new cash cow. It's
already led to AP signing a deal to provide celebrity video for
People.com."
Sundance
Channel might be joining The Weather Channel on the cable selling
block. Pali Research analyst Richard Greenfield wrote in a report,
citing "multiple" sources that Sundance, which counts some 26 million
subscribers, was seeking a minimum of $400 million, which would value
it at $15 per subscribers.
Ok, folks, another day, another lack
of a dollar. If you are in NY and want to join a major protest against
Bear Steans and JP Morgan, I will have details next week.