Pacific Free Press was launched in March 2007 by Dutch-Canadian Richard
Kastelein of V.O.F. Expathos, in the Netherlands along with Chris Cook- CFUV radio journalist and Editor in Chief of Pacific Free Press. Cook is based in , Victoria, British Columbia.
The site is a sister to Atlantic Free Press and Brick Ogden an American Expatriate in Amsterdam has been a key supporter of this project.
The mission of Pacific Free Press is simple: to dig out nuggets of truth from
the slag-heap of lies, ignorance and witless diversion that has buried
public discourse today. Pacific Free Press provides a new venue for
disseminating hard news and insightful, fact-based analysis of the
harsh realities too often ignored or distorted by the mainstream press.
Today, (Wed. Mar. 19, 2008) Canada's Supreme Court ruled a motion filed by lawyers for "Canadian Taliban" Omar Khadr, currently imprisoned at Guantanamo Bay, can proceed for the court's consideration.
They will hear arguments and rule on whether the treatment meted out to Khadr violates his rights under international law and whether his incarceration is contrary to the Geneva Convention on the treatment of prisoners of war.
They will also hear arguments questioning the ability of American Justice to meet internationally required benchmarks for fairness in the case.
The challenge comes as American authorities are in the early
stages of the detainee's trial, (technically Khadr is ruled by U.S.
authorities to be an "illegal combatant") for the murder of an American
sergeant, killed during the battle that led to Khadr's capture.
Omar
Khadr's lawyers challenge that charge and are requesting the release
of Canadian documents regarding their client's capture and subsequent
interrogation. Those documents remain undisclosed in any but heavily
redacted form, but preliminary evidence indicates Khadr was not the
only survivor of the engagement, as previously reported, so may not
have been the one alleged to have thrown the hand grenade that killed
Special Forces Sergeant Christopher Speer.
For their part, the
U.S. Federal Justice Department filed against the Khadr motion,
contending it was not the business of the Canadian court to rule on
matters of American concern. The Canadian Supreme Court disagreed and
will begin hearing testimony next week.
It is the second failure in
less than a week for U.S. government lawyers trying the case; last
week, during hearings of the Military Commission at Guantanamo Bay, a
defense petition for the deposition of testimony of a Lt. Colonel, (identified only
as, LTC "W.") present at the scene of Khadr's capture was deemed by the
commission as admissible despite the prosecution's claim, under rule
702(c)3(a) of the Rules for Military Commissions, the testimony
would make public classified information and so should not be entered
for "good cause."
For Khadr it is the first glimmer of hope his nearly
six year-long ordeal in captivity could soon be coming to an end.
Just and Good Cause
Way
back in the beginning, in the days after the twin towers fell in New
York City, Omar Khadr was a Canadian teenager living with his father
and brothers in Afghanistan.
Khadr's dad was a friend of Osama bin
Laden, the man named by the Bush administration as being behind the
heinous 9/11 attacks. Because the then-ruling Taliban regime refused to
extradite bin Laden without compelling evidence connecting him to the
crime he was being accused of complicity in, America launched a massive
bombing campaign across Afghanistan, followed by a limited land
invasion, fronted by U.S. special forces and various intelligence
agencies.
No declaration of war was filed in the American congress, though
international "sanction" for the U.S. retaliation, based on the U.N.'s
Article 51, a provision allowing nations suffering "on-going" attacks
from a foreign nation the right to self-defense, (decried as a specious
interpretation of 51 by anti-war protesters) "allowed" the launch of 'Operation
Enduring Freedom.'
From his Madrasa, (religious
school) in Afghanistan, Omar Khadr could not be aware of the frenzied
diplomacy going on behind the scenes of America's impending invasion
and he likely was not aware of the millions of people around the world
marching and sending petitions to the American administration in efforts to dissuade Bush's predictably violent response, but when news
of the invasion's commencement reached them, Omar's future was clear: He would be a soldier of the Jihad, fighting the infidel beside his
brothers and father.
The Taliban government had fallen six months
before, its leaders scattered throughout the mountainous regions of the
southeast of Afghanistan and into the so-called Tribal territories of
north-western Pakistan, when U.S. forces reached Ab Khail, the small
hill-town where Khadr and company were taking refuge.
As Jeff Tietz of
Rolling Stone relates, U.S. forces spotted the fighters and sent
translators into their compound to gain a surrender, but the
translators were killed.
A ferocious aerial bombardment was ordered,
and a firefight followed. As the Americans moved through the ruins of
the bombed out compound "mopping up," a wounded survivor tossed a
grenade, the explosion killing one of them.
Khadr was found
seriously wounded, bleeding from two bullet wounds through his back and
chest and shrapnel wounds to his face and eye. The diminutive fifteen
year-old was later reported to have begged soldiers, "kill me."
But,
the "sole survivor" of that day's fighting was not killed. Instead, Omar
Khadr was stitched up and sent to Bagram Airbase.
Bagram is to
Afghanistan what Abu Ghraib is to Iraq; the sprawling base outside
Kabul having a dedicated detention and interrogation wing, where all the
sordid methods made famous in Baghdad's gruesome monument to both
Saddam Hussein's and his successor's brutality are too practiced
against its hapless inhabitants, if only less reported. There, the
child-soldier was "interrogated" as he recovered from his wounds, itself a violation of the Geneva Convention ratified by the U.S.
Khadr's
defense has maintained their client was tortured, made to swear
confessions for the killing of Sergeant Speer, and threatened with rape and
other atrocities should he fail to comply.
The threats must have been
an easy thing for the youngster to believe, as he found himself bagged,
tagged, and sent off to Guantanamo's infamous Camp X-Ray.
Khadr's
testimony about his treatment at the hands of his captors, made during March
2003 meetings he had with individuals claiming to be Canadian
government officials, makes for chilling reading.
Khadr says;
"I showed
them my injuries and told them that what I had told the Americans was
not right and not true. I said that I told the Americans whatever they
wanted me to say because they would torture me."
Khadr then says;
"The Canadians called me a liar and I began to sob. They screamed at me and told me that they could not do anything for me."
In
2005, the Canadian government forbade further interrogations at
Guantanamo by their agents, claiming the prison failed to meet Canadian
standards under the country's Charter of Rights and Freedoms; but, it
has so far failed to secure, or even attempted to gain, Omar Khadr's
freedom from the Guantanamo Bay facility, as both Britain and Australia
managed to do for their respective citizens held there.
It is hoped now
the Supreme Court hearings in Canada will shed new light on the great
suffering of Canada's child-prisoner, while the order demanding
delivery by April fourth to the Military Commission in Guantanamo of
LTC "W.'s" deposition could clear Omar Khadr of the charge of murder
that has seen him spend his teenage years confined to this century's
equivalent of those abominable black holes inhabited by the enemies of
Empire in times past.
And perhaps these two legal rulings are a
signal it is time for the turning of stones; a time to shed light on
the situations of all those other, uncounted 'Omar Khadrs' out there,
suffering anonymously the depravities of America's new notion of
justice.
Thank god someone is trying to help this kid! It is amazing how scared people are to support this kid, the culture of fear - and the backlash against any sort of anti-war stance, seems to scare people away from supporting him. [even on blog comments].
Everyone I talk to however, feels its completely disgusting the way he has been treated. How many people even support the war at all? Its an illegal occupation, but no one wants to end up on the losing side of a battle...
at least we have anonymous comments to speak some truth? I tried posting a message of support on the National Post blog, but it was never accepted. Where is the support people?
Everyone I talk to however, feels its completely disgusting the way he has been treated. How many people even support the war at all? Its an illegal occupation, but no one wants
to end up on the losing side of a battle...
at least we have anonymous comments to speak some truth? I tried posting a message of support on the National Post blog, but it was never accepted. Where is the support people?