Pacific Free Press was launched in March 2007 by Dutch-Canadian Richard
Kastelein of V.O.F. Expathos, in the Netherlands along with Chris Cook- CFUV radio journalist and Editor in Chief of Pacific Free Press. Cook is based in , Victoria, British Columbia.
The site is a sister to Atlantic Free Press and Brick Ogden an American Expatriate in Amsterdam has been a key supporter of this project.
The mission of Pacific Free Press is simple: to dig out nuggets of truth from
the slag-heap of lies, ignorance and witless diversion that has buried
public discourse today. Pacific Free Press provides a new venue for
disseminating hard news and insightful, fact-based analysis of the
harsh realities too often ignored or distorted by the mainstream press.
The Unmaking of a Nation - Harper's Golden Spike
by C. L. Cook Canada has again distinguished itself in the United Nations for a singular commitment to the destruction of the Palestinian people. Recall Canada, great paragon of democracy, in the days following the 2006 Hamas electoral victory in remnant Palestine, being first to charge the world stage and declare support for Israel's announced sanctions and divestment campaign against the nascent government.
Israel, also "in protest" of vile Hamas, refused to remit Israeli collected taxes owed the legally elected administration. A red-faced Harper then declared to the world, he would not have over "one red cent" of Canadian aid monies to Hamas.
Any suspicion Harper's premature coming to Israel's aid was a
sign of the then-newly minted prime minister's over-eagerness to prove
himself an international player must be dispelled by today's
performance at the United Nation's Human Rights Council special meeting
on a resolution drafted by the Organization of the Islamic Conference.
Canada alone today voted against a resolution calling on the end of the
now two-year siege of Gaza and cessation of Israeli military operations.
The Strip, already one of the world's most
miserable places to live, has recently witnessed some of the worst
conditions in the decades-long citizen experience of military atrocity.
These past weeks saw ramped up efforts on Israel's part; the results
of those being at least 90 Palestinians killed in various IDF attacks.
The U.N. Human Rights Council issued condemnations of IDF actions in
Gaza and the West Bank, calling for Israel to cease hostilities and
allow deliveries of food and fuel. Those calls have been met with
derision and veiled threats by Israel's Ambassador to the United
Nations in Geneva Yitzhak Levanon, who called the proceedings a
"farce," while cautioning cryptically the council could be making the
mistakes its predecessor, the now defunct U.N. Human Rights Committee had
made.
Gaza's only power plant depends on fuel oil brought in
from Israel. Those supplies are too subject to embargo, so lack of
electricity is now the single greatest threat to the public health of
Gaza's estimated one and half million people. Without power, water,
sewage and security suffer and needless death and disease is the distinctly
probable outcome of cutting off the juice.
What Israel is doing
is clearly a war crime under conventions against using "collective
punishment" against civilians. It is in fact considered to be: "State-sponsored
terrorism."
Israeli government officials admit, the fuel shipments will
be blocked as long as rockets are fired into Israeli-occupied areas.
Targeted assassinations, bombings, and rocket attacks against the
refugee camps in Gaza are, says the IDF, retaliatory and justified.
"Justification" for nightly IDF missions in the West Bank, from whence
no rockets emanate is a little more nebulous.
But legally
speaking it doesn't matter what Israel's rationale for doing what it
does is, when what it does is unlawful. The same is true of any crime,
and the motives of those firing rockets into civilian neighbourhoods
does not allow that behaviour continue while we debate its case merits
either.
Yes, there will be a time when arguments are heard and evidence
presented; but the criminal activity cannot be allowed to continue in
the meantime. Lawfully, "we," the world community has no right to
condone its continuation. But Stephen Harper braves rush in and declare
Canada will again leap to the aid of the mighty to better their
domination.
The Summer of 2006. Lots of Lebanese-Canadians
take their kids back to the old country over summer vacations. And
that's what the El-Ahkras family of Montreal were doing when a
kidnapping and border clash far away quickly escalated into a full
aerial assault on the village of their forefathers that July.
They had
been warned they had half-an-hour to get out before the destruction of
the town, Guernica fashion. Great convoys of civilians, crammed in cars
crammed with whatever they thought best to take away from an impending
natural disaster, made out across the killing grounds. The convoys, driving along the narrow roadways out of
the south were sitting ducks.
Watching the carnage in the
aftermath, I recalled similar images of those damned Iraqis caught fleeing
along the infamous "Highway of Death" at the close of Desert Storm; and
I remembered the wreckage of Kosovar Albanian farmer's tractor convoys; women and
kids destroyed by the U.S. Air Force.
In Lebanon the people were told
to flee immediately, and were then cooly destroyed from the air. The
entire El-Ahkras family were killed that way, and what did their prime
minister, Stephen Harper have to say to Israel about it?
What
did the United Nations do? More than a thousand dead, and an entire
region of a country littered with millions of unexploded cluster bombs
that continue killing and maiming indiscriminately, a country's
infrastructure in ruin, and what reaction? Nothing? Next to it.
So, shall we
now then watch the final extirpation of Palestine to starvation behind
an Israeli wall none dare assail? Or, perhaps enjoin the howling
against the victims as the corporate media/war complex does?
No, I
doubt we'll see what's happening. Which is of course why the Canadian
government representatives are so quick now to assert to Egypt's
perennial president Mubarek it is his duty to "un-tear down the wall" so
dramatically breached this week; we wouldn't want more pictures of the
streaming hoards of desperate Palestinian housewives, clambering over
twisted fencing while wrestling with bags of essentials unavailable at
home. Canada's leader would have the lid put back in place, the sooner
the better it seems.
Of the continuing blockade, Canada's
representative to the Council, Terry Cormier expressed his concern
about the Islamic Conference backed resolution, saying:
"Unfortunately,
neither this resolution nor the current session addressed the role of
both parties. It was regretful that the current draft resolution did
not condemn the rocket attacks on Israeli civilians."
I'm
certain M. Cormier is aware of the immense asymmetry of the
Israel/Palestine conflict. While it's true the Kassam and other rocket
attacks have killed and wounded civilians and soldiers in Israel,
dismissing the petition out of hand because it only addresses Israeli
state crime does not dismiss the fact of Israel's continuing
criminality.
The panel could, and likely has, condemned the actions of
religious factions like al Qaida, and more organized non-state entities
like Hezbollah, and Hamas irregulars; but they can't make effective
resolutions to curb the activities of a cell of rocket makers in a
basement somewhere in Gaza.
Maybe the council's motion was prioritizing
the greater actor, before next addressing the lesser, who knows? But
the crime is fact and must be stopped in any event. What M. Cormier and
Canada's prime minister Harper are doing is abetting at best, and at
worst it's a grotesque acquiescence to Real Politik that would allow a
mass human catastrophe in Gaza.
At the end of the day; 30 of the
47 nation participants on the council voted in favour of releasing a
statement calling on Israel to stop military operations in and over
Gaza, and to open border checkpoints to allow food, fuel, and medicine.
Speaking for Israel, Ambassador Levanon called the council a "circus,"
while UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon was less than supportive, saying;
"I
appreciate that the council is looking in depth into this particular
situation. And it is rightly doing so. I would also appreciate it if
the council will be looking with the same level of attention and
urgency at all other matters around the world. There are still many
areas where human rights are abused and not properly protected."
And
Canada staked out its position as the one and only country to vote "No"
to allowing a starved and embattled people due process, and would deny
them the relief from the entirely created disaster that is Gaza a
doorway open to the world could provide.
[Mike Whitney has an interesting take on the "spontaneous" breach in Egypt's border fence with Gaza here.]