Pacific Free Press was launched in March 2007 by Dutch-Canadian Richard
Kastelein of V.O.F. Expathos, in the Netherlands along with Chris Cook- CFUV radio journalist and Editor in Chief of Pacific Free Press. Cook is based in , Victoria, British Columbia.
The site is a sister to Atlantic Free Press and Brick Ogden an American Expatriate in Amsterdam has been a key supporter of this project.
The mission of Pacific Free Press is simple: to dig out nuggets of truth from
the slag-heap of lies, ignorance and witless diversion that has buried
public discourse today. Pacific Free Press provides a new venue for
disseminating hard news and insightful, fact-based analysis of the
harsh realities too often ignored or distorted by the mainstream press.
Adios Mes Amigos
by Jack Random Something is missing in the debate on illegal immigration. We listen to Lou Dobbs, the self-proclaimed champion of political independence, blaming twelve million unauthorized migrants for the problems of the American middle class. We listen to a Republican presidential candidate plead for just a little compassion not for the immigrants but for their progeny and watch him get hammered by the hardcore right.
Everyone condemns employers for employing immigrants over native Americans or rather, legal immigrants but no one is really demanding the kind of enforcement that would end the practice.
JAZZMAN CHRONICLES - DISSEMINATE FREELY
PROFILES IN COURAGE: ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS
Corporations are the sponsors of political candidates and, in any
case, it would only hurt the small businesses that candidates promote
as the heart of our economy.
Even the defenders of immigration
fall back on their heels against the assault, protesting that most
immigrants are not of the criminal element, that not all abuse the
system and that most contribute to the economy on balance.
What
is missing from the discussion is basic common sense not the brand of
common sense that demands an impenetrable wall across the southern
border but the kind that breaks it down to human terms.
NAFTA
and CAFTA, the landmark free trade agreements covering North and
South America, have not produced the kind of job and wage increases
promised by former president Bill Clinton and his bipartisan allies in
congress. Free trade proponents south of the border failed to foresee
that absent organized labor wages would remain subterranean and jobs
would go to the lowest bidder most notably India and China.
Proponents north of the border failed to foresee that given inadequate
wages and marginal social services, the incentive to migrate north
would become more powerful than ever.
What is missing from the
debate is that, given the circumstances, we would do exactly the same
as our neighbors to the south. That is, those among us who are
physically strong enough, presented with a choice of watching our
children go hungry for lack of food, grow ill from inadequate housing,
clean water and health care, would raise whatever money we could, hand
it to an unscrupulous coyote and make the long hard journey across
the northern border.
The bravest and strongest among us would
risk anything and everything for a chance to build a decent life for
our children and families. They would ford rivers, walk barren
deserts, evade border patrol and vigilantes, forge documents, live in
crowded conditions and pay bribes for the possibility of a better life.
In America, we used to call such individuals heroes. Now we call them criminals.
In
Mexico, Guatemala, Panama, Columbia and anywhere else where people have
suffered under the mandates of free trade agreements, they still call
them heroes.
When rightwing politicians, desperate for an
issue that deflects the blame from their own sorry policies of
corporate protectionism and greed, condemn any expression of sympathy
and decry even the most modest of compromises as amnesty, they are
practicing the lowest of the political arts: pandering to the
reactionary base.
Let us be clear: Any proposal that requires
illegal immigrants to pay a substantial fine, voluntarily submit to
deportation or get in the back of the line is neither realistic nor
sincere. The compromise that failed to gain passage in congress was
merely an attempt to push the issue off the table.
Those who
have come to this country, secured jobs in what can only be described
as an underground economy, will not give up what they have worked so
hard and sacrificed so much for on these terms. These are poor
people. They live day to day at the mercy of their employers, who can
choose to pay them or have them rounded up by the immigration service.
Asking them to pay thousands of dollars in fines is like asking them to
take food out of the mouths of their children.
Asking them to return
to their homelands to get in the back of the line is like asking them
to scale Everest without a guide. Having been raised here since early
childhood, many have no homes in their countries of origin. They would
become the equivalent of migrants in their own lands, rejoining the
pool of slave labor and refueling the vicious cycle of survival and
escape.
They could not and would not do it and, in their shoes, neither would you or I.
We
call them criminals but what is the crime? They have acted with
courage, perseverance and sacrifice. They have done what any people
would do.
No one is asking for medals of valor but until we
begin to address the enormous problems created by unregulated corporate
greed on a global scale by demanding fair wages and minimal standards
of labor, the least we can do is accept responsibility and offer
forgiveness.
It is strange what politicians can do with
words. In every working democracy in the world but ours, there is a
viable socialist party. In America we despise anything social as in
socialized medicine though the vast majority of us would accept
nonprofit health care as not only acceptable but appropriate to the
healthcare profession.
Now, the very same crowd that invokes
the name of Jesus would have us believe that amnesty is a dirty
word. Far too many of us recoil at the word as if it was an
unforgivable offense and yet amnesty is the only solution to the
problem of illegal immigrants within our borders.
Yes, it is a
problem not because it steals our jobs, squanders our resources and
cripples our economy but because it creates a permanent underclass:
people without rights, representation or legal recourse.
We
need amnesty to bring these workers out of the shadows so they can
contribute openly and be treated with the common decency due all human
beings. They would be empowered to organize, lifting wages for all of
us. They would be empowered to vote, expanding the franchise and
strengthening our democracy.
Even Ronald Reagan recognized
that amnesty was the only solution. To suggest that we should or could
deport millions of illegal immigrants by force of arms is a fairy
tale. Beyond the violence and inhumanity that such a mass deportation
would bring, the cost would compel us to suspend all other programs
while we pursued this singular endeavor.
There are better ways to end the war.
Of
course, if we granted amnesty and failed to address the policies that
helped to create the problem (as Reagan did), we would be revisiting
the problem in short order.
Until fair trade with labor rights
and living wages replaces free trade in the global economy, there
will be no lasting solution.
Jazz.
JACK RANDOM IS THE
AUTHOR OF THE JAZZMAN CHRONICLES (CROW DOG PRESS) AND GHOST DANCE
INSURRECTION (DRY BONES PRESS). THE CHRONICLES HAVE BEEN POSTED ON
NUMEROUS CITES OF THE WORLDWIDE WEB, INCLUDING THE ALBION MONITOR,
BELLACIAO, BUZZLE, COUNTERPUNCH, DISSIDENT VOICE, THE NATIONAL FREE
PRESS AND PACIFIC FREE PRESS. SEE WWW.JAZZMANCHRONICLES.BLOGSPOT.COM
While impressed by the form and pathos of this response, I find it scattered and weak in logos. It begins with what appears to be a plea for the poor to rise up against the corporate elite and their corrupt governments -- a phenomenon which has been taking place in the electoral process throughout Latin America. It subsequently lashes out "vermin" who slander the American people, undercut wages and abuse social services.
I am not familiar with the slanderers and would defend slander of any kind. If you connect the dots, however, it is trade policy that has created the problem of mass immigration, undercutting American wages and shipping jobs to other countries. The responder does not address trade policy -- a telling omission.
The assertion that there is no hunger in Mexico or Latin America and that illegal immigrants are purchasing SUV's and luxury homes from their accumulated wealth is frankly bizarre. A quick fact check finds that the World Bank estimates a 53% poverty rate in Mexico (less than $2 a day) with 24% in extreme poverty (less than $1 a day). The UN estimates a 43% poverty rate in Latin America with 19% classified as indigent. The Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean estimates that 11% are undernourished and that 9% of children under five manifest acute malnutrition and 19% show chronic malnutrition.
Where is the evidence immigrant prosperity and wealth?
The remainder of the response does not lend itself to rational discourse. For the record, I am neither socialist nor communist. I believe strongly in the principles of democracy. I believe that a hybrid economy, unencumbered by ideological mandates, functions best. I believe that government has a responsibility to control the excesses of corporate greed. I do not believe in Adam Smith or Karl Marx -- although both offer much to the forum of economic theory.
The only solution to America's economic crisis -- and it is a crisis -- begins by reforming its trade policies and upholding the international rights of labor. Only by lifting up workers everywhere can a balance be achieved corporate greed and the common good.
While impressed by the form and pathos of this response, I find it scattered and weak in logos. It begins with what appears to be a plea for the poor to rise up against the corporate elite and their corrupt governments -- a phenomenon which has been taking place in the electoral process throughout Latin America. It subsequently lashes out "vermin" who slander the American people, undercut wages and abuse social services.
I am not familiar with the slanderers and would defend slander of any kind. If you connect the dots, however, it is trade policy that has created the problem of mass immigration, undercutting American wages and shipping jobs to other countries. The responder does not address trade policy -- a telling omission.
The assertion that there is no hunger in Mexico or Latin America and that illegal immigrants are purchasing SUV's and luxury homes from their accumulated wealth is frankly bizarre. A quick fact check finds that the World Bank estimates a 53% poverty rate in Mexico (less than $2 a day) with 24% in extreme poverty (less than $1 a day). The UN estimates a 43% poverty rate in Latin America with 19% classified as indigent. The Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean estimates that 11% are undernourished and that 9% of children under five manifest acute malnutrition and 19% show chronic malnutrition.
Where is the evidence immigrant prosperity and wealth?
The remainder of the response does not lend itself to rational discourse. For the record, I am neither socialist nor communist. I believe strongly in the principles of democracy. I believe that a hybrid economy, unencumbered by ideological mandates, functions best. I believe that government has a responsibility to control the excesses of corporate greed. I do not believe in Adam Smith or Karl Marx -- although both offer much to the forum of economic theory.
The only solution to America's economic crisis -- and it is a crisis -- begins by reforming its trade policies and upholding the international rights of labor. Only by lifting up workers everywhere can a balance be achieved corporate greed and the common good.
Jazz...