Earl Ofari Hutchinson refuses to except Ron Paul’s explanation that he had nothing to do with the purportedly racist writings that appeared in a newsletter associated with the Texan Republican.
For Mr. Hutchinson, the mere fact Dr. Paul is a libertarian is suspect:
- "Even
if Paul, as he claims, didn’t write or utter one of the offensive
words, or hold the sentiments, that are attributed to him, his odd mish
mash of ultra conservatism and libertarian spoutings marks him as
suspect. The cornerstone of the jumble is his view of government and
what it should or should not do about civil rights. Paul holds that
government should have minimal or better still no role in civil rights
laws and enforcement. The government passed and enforced civil rights
laws, did nothing to solve the country’s racial ills, and worse, fueled
even more racial polarization, he says. That old, worn, and thoroughly
discredited view warms the hearts of the packs of closet bigots that
pine for the old days when racial and gender discrimination was the
American norm and government did little to protect black and gay rights."
In
other words, libertarianism, for Earl, is predicated on racism, a
politically brain-dead or at least disingenuous allusion with
absolutely no basis in reality. In fact, the government is not
interested in civil rights or for that matter individual rights based
on natural law — as history repeatedly demonstrates, government exists
to ensure the continuation of its own criminal enterprise and it
considers the citizenry — regardless of race, creed, or gender — as
little more than a cash cow and, at certain times, a slave labor force
to be exploited and cast aside. Earl may not like it, but the hard cold
fact is that civil rights laws were enacted as political expediency in
response to the fact outraged citizens of color were burning down
cities and endangering the empire. LBJ was not an advocate of civil
liberties. He was a political horse trader. Same can be said for the
Kennedy brothers, who are idolized by many blacks.
- "Paul piles
even more suspicion on his denial of racial bias when he even more
absurdly tries to claim that he is pounded as a racist because more and
more blacks cheer him for blasting the drug laws as biased and harmful
to blacks. The disparities in drug law enforcement are gaping, and
demand reform, but urging that they be totally scrapped is a far
different matter.
- The drug plague and the crime, violence, and
family wreckage that has come with it has torn poor black communities
and has caused much pain and suffering among African-Americans. The
last thing that the majority of African-Americans want to see is open
and unchecked illicit drug selling bizarres operating in their
communities. Blacks have been among those that have shouted the loudest
for crackdowns on crime and drugs."
In other words, according
to Mr. Hutchinson, most blacks believe the government has the right to
tell its subjects what they can or cannot put in their bodies. Is
Hutchinson unaware of the well documented fact the CIA and criminal
bankers are responsible for the massive infusion of drugs into this
country? Hutchinson and crew play right into this scam by insisting
there be “crackdowns on crime and drugs,†as the crackdown —
necessitating a police state — is part of the whole scheme. If indeed
Mr. Hutchinson was interested in ending the “pain and suffering among
African-Americans,†he would demand the government stop importing drugs
and dumping them on those of us least able to resist.
- The Paul
newsletters are damning enough, and if any of the racist stuff in them
is true, that instantly disqualifies him as fit to run for any national
office. And those that defend those views should be branded as what
they are, bigots and crackpots.
Few if any have defended the
newsletters and Dr. Paul has bent over backwards to disavow and
repudiate them, but that is of course not enough for Hutchinson and
crew, determined to keep race-based politics at the center of American
political life. One has to wonder who Earl Ofari Hutchinson will vote
for come November. Obama? Hillary? Obviously none of the troglodytes
currently selected on the Republican side of the One Party system, as
they represent racism, or so the political fairy tale would have it.
In
fact, all of the candidates — in fact selected horses in a rigged race
— are minions to the man and woman of the New World Order, the
globalist scam to turn the entire planet into a slave labor gulag. It
matters not to them if a slave is brown, white, yellow, or purple with
green polka dots — all are ciphers and fodder to be used for the
emerging global order.
Is Ron Paul a perfect candidate? No.
But he is the best in the current line-up, consisting mostly of
criminals, shills, and factotums for the global slave plantation. Ron
Paul understands that the best chance we have to turn the tide of
perpetual war and economic servitude based on fractional banking and
debt is a return to our Constitutional heritage, albeit that heritage
was long ago subverted and is now but a ghostly shadow.
I bet
Earl Ofari Hutchinson would beg to differ. After all, many of the
founders were slave holders and that alone discredits the idea of a
constitutionally limited republic.
A republic based on
constitutional principles will also put an end to race-based political
favoritism, essentially a form of totalitarianism.
Let’s face it. Guys like Earl Ofari Hutchinson will not be placated until Ron Paul is prostrate and sacrifices himself on the altar of political correctness. Earl writes today for the 
