Home arrow Writings arrow Work Crew Stopped at Bear Mountain Stand-off

Translate

Search

About

Pacific Free Press was launched in March 2007 by Dutch-Canadian Richard Kastelein of V.O.F. Expathos, in the Netherlands along with  Chris Cook - CFUV radio journalist and Editor in Chief of Pacific Free Press. Cook is based in , Victoria, British Columbia.

The site is a sister to Atlantic Free Press.

The mission of Pacific Free Press is simple: to dig out nuggets of truth from the slag-heap of lies, ignorance and witless diversion that has buried public discourse today. Pacific Free Press provides a new venue for disseminating hard news and insightful, fact-based analysis of the harsh realities too often ignored or distorted by the mainstream press.

 

Work Crew Stopped at Bear Mountain Stand-off Print E-mail
Written by zoe blunt   
Saturday, 12 January 2008
Work Stopped at Bear Mountain Mountain
by Zoe Blunt
Environmentalists and surveyers for the Bear Mountain (Spencer Road) Interchange faced off in Langford again Thursday, Jan 10.
 
A small crew of workers arrived at the highway to take measurements and place stakes just before noon, and they were met by the tree sit crew. 
 
There was a polite exchange of views, the work crew set up their equipment, and the tree sitters stood in front of the instruments and peacefully obstructed the surveying. After making a brief effort to survey the area, the crew packed up the instruments and left.

An hour later, bylaw enforcement officers visited the camp and tried to enter some of the tents in the area and look into people's bags and backpacks. They were persuaded to leave off their searches, after which the officers left. No court orders or legal documents have been served on the camp yet. This is the first attempt to start work on the interchange since before Christmas.

Starting Saturday January 12, volunteers will be circulating a petition to reject Langford's bylaw to borrow $25 million for the interchange and create a Local Area Service plan. 
 
City council took the unusual step of adopting two bylaws at a "special" meeting two days after Christmas, although the agenda only called for first reading. The creation of a Local Area Service plan exempts the decision from the counter-petition process, which normally gives citizens the opportunity to reject a city council decision.

Nevertheless, Steven Hurdle of Langford is organizing a petition drive to gather 2000 signatures against the plan. "While Langford may have found a legal loophole in declaring  the interchange a 'Local Service Area' to let them avoid the referendum, we can still win the political war," he writes. Volunteers meet Saturday 9:30am at Redeemer Lutheran Church (911 Jenkins Ave in Langford).
 
Contact: Steven Hurdle 885-0717

ZoeBlunt@gmail.com

 
 
Media update

UPDATE: For immediate release Jan 11 2007
 
Media Advisory

January 11 2008


Contact: Adrian C. Duncan, P. Eng.
Director, BC Speleological Federation
President, Vancouver Island Cave Exploration Group.
Tel. and fax: 604-941-9409
Email:  lduncan@direct.ca


Summary:


The BC Speleological Federation (BCSF) has been negotiating in a spirit of cooperation with the City of Langford to protect Langford Lake Cave at the site of the planned Spencer Road Interchange. The BCSF is concerned about damage to the cave and other karst features in the area, and is advocating for a relocation of the interchange. The group recommended a complete geotechnical assessment, which the city has not done. The city has also failed to protect the cave and other natural features.


The new interchange "will completely and irreversibly alienate a substantial portion of the karst unit within which the cave is located and will destroy any as-yet unidentified cave passages which may exist within the affected area. In addition, the City has advised that blasting will take place to a depth of 2 - 7 metres at a distance of only 9 metres from the most easterly point of the surveyed cave. In the view of Federation representatives who have examined the cave, the potential for damage to, or even destruction of, the cave as a result of the proposed blasting is extremely high."

The full text of the press release follows.

BC Speleological Federation

City of Langford - Spencer Road Interchange

The BC Speleological Federation ("the Federation") represents the broad interests of active caving organizations in British Columbia. As such, the Federation has a clear mandate from its members to speak out for the caving community on matters relating to cave and karst (limestone terrain) conservation within the Province.

Vancouver Island includes some of the most significant cave and karst resources to be found anywhere in Canada. The Greater Victoria area is among the few Provincial and State capital regions in North America having cave and karst features within its boundaries. The Federation takes the view that this distinctive ecological feature of the Greater Victoria area sets it apart from other capital regions and hence should be conserved to the maximum extent possible, as indeed should cave and karst resources everywhere given the fact that such features take many millennia to form and are thus irreplaceable once lost or damaged. 

The Federation has taken a close interest in the interchange project currently being pursued by the City of Langford, reportedly to serve the nearby Bear Mountain development. That development has already resulted in the loss of one cave which formerly lay within the Bear Mountain project area. This was SPAET Cave, the destruction of which has been amply documented in the media.

It was therefore with great concern that the Federation learned in early 2007 that the proposed location for the new interchange coincided with a substantial and well-known area of karst in the vicinity of Spencer Road. This area of karst includes the longest currently-accessible limestone cave in the Greater Victoria area - Langford Lake Cave.  The area is considered to have a significant potential to contain other cave passages as yet undiscovered. 

From the outset, the Federation has taken the view that the loss of even one cave to a specific development is indefensible in a community which prides itself on its ecological setting and that the loss of (or damage to) a second cave to a road project apparently being pursued largely in support of the same development would simply add insult to injury. Accordingly, the Federation has strongly advocated the relocation of the interchange project to an area in which cave and karst features do not exist.  As long ago as May 2007 the Federation recommended that prior to any final decisions being taken with respect to the location and design of this project, a detailed karst inventory of the proposed site be undertaken by qualified karst specialists in accordance with the "Karst Inventory Standards and Vulnerability Assessment Procedures for British Columbia" and other relevant standards.

To the present knowledge of the Federation, no such inventory was ever undertaken. Indeed, the Federation has been informed by the City of Langford that the geotechnical consultants retained by the City to assess the project site did not even enter the cave.  Proper assessment of the cave is clearly impossible under these circumstances. 

To at least partially make good this deficiency, the cave was re-surveyed (mapped) in more detail by members of the Vancouver Island Cave Exploration Group (a Federation member group) at their own expense.  The resulting map survey was made available to the City at no charge for their consideration in the planning of the project. The new cave map supplements much older maps of the cave, including one produced by cavers in 1975 which was also made available to the City.

Despite the recommendations and actions summarized above, which were undertaken in a sincere spirit of co-operation in the expectation that they would be given full consideration, no further karst studies appear to have been undertaken, and the Federation has now been informed by staff of the City of Langford that the location of the Spencer Road interchange has been finalized in its published form notwithstanding the clear negative implications of the project upon cave and karst resources within and adjacent to the site.  

The location published on the City's web site will completely and irreversibly alienate a substantial portion of the karst unit within which the cave is located and will destroy any as-yet unidentified cave passages which may exist within the affected area.  In addition, the City has advised that blasting will take place to a depth of 2 - 7 metres at a distance of only 9 metres from the most easterly point of the surveyed cave. In the view of Federation representatives who have examined the cave, the potential for damage to, or even destruction of, the cave as a result of the proposed blasting is extremely high. In addition, the project as presently understood will pose as-yet undocumented risks to the LLC site's natural ecological integrity as a result of  the proximity and ongoing use and maintenance of the projected road as well as possible impacts upon the groundwater hydrology of the area. 

The City recently made a verbal commitment to the Federation that they would undertake a last-minute karst inventory, primarily to identify potential mitigation measures which might reduce karst impacts. While mitigation of unavoidable impacts is desirable, the fact remains that avoidance of such impacts in the first place should always be the primary goal.  With the reported finalization of the project design and location, the opportunity for impact avoidance has now passed.  Although the proposed study may identify measures for the mitigation of physical impacts to the cave itself through measures to reduce blast-related ground acceleration, there is no way in which mitigation can be provided for the direct loss of karst features and associated ecosystem which will be removed to make way for the interchange. 

It is the opinion of the Federation and its member organizations that a project such as this which is located on public land and is understood to be receiving public funding should be subject to the exercise of due diligence with respect to all aspects of its planning and design.  It has yet to be demonstrated to the Federation that due diligence has been exercised with respect to the cave and karst issues associated with this project.

Accordingly, the Federation and its member organizations wish to go on the public record as being opposed to the Spencer Road Interchange project at its present location.
 
 
Comments (0)Add Comment

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
smaller | bigger

busy
 
Bookmark/Tag
digg
NewsVine
Delicious
Reddit
YahooMyWeb
Furl it!
BlinkList
connotea
Fark
< Prev   Next >

 

More Author Articles

More Articles...
Small Victories on a Bare Mountain
Friday, 19 September 2008
zoe blunt
(174)
Read more
Fairly Unbalanced: 'Wild Earth' and Public Eye
Wednesday, 13 August 2008
zoe blunt
(300)
Read more
Crown Stays Charges in Bear Mountain Stand-off
Wednesday, 14 May 2008
zoe blunt
(416)
Read more
Goons Attack Bear Mountain Pacifist Protest
Saturday, 01 March 2008
zoe blunt
(754)
Read more
Langford Mayor Threatens SLAPP Suit Against Forest Defenders
Wednesday, 27 February 2008
zoe blunt
(536)
Read more
Wildcat Tree-Sit at Busted Bear Mountain Interchange
Friday, 22 February 2008
zoe blunt
(558)
Read more
Update: Bear Mountain Destruction
Sunday, 17 February 2008
zoe blunt
(589)
Read more
Tree-sitters Warned Against "Interfering"
Wednesday, 30 January 2008
zoe blunt
(583)
Read more
Stopping Traffic: Langford Voters Rebellion
Monday, 21 January 2008
zoe blunt
(717)
Read more
Bear Mountain Saga: The Rise of the Racoons
Wednesday, 16 January 2008
zoe blunt
(706)
Read more
Work Crew Stopped at Bear Mountain Stand-off
Saturday, 12 January 2008
zoe blunt
(511)
Read more
The Saddest Pagan
Saturday, 29 December 2007
zoe blunt
(504)
Read more
Bear Mountain Tree Sitters Prepare for a Showdown
Saturday, 15 December 2007
zoe blunt
(618)
Read more
RCMP: Cooping the Langford Tree-Sit
Saturday, 15 December 2007
zoe blunt
(631)
Read more
Chris Floyd

 

Amazon.com

Paul William Roberts



Amazon.com

Norman Solomon

Amazon.com

Heather Wokusch


Amazon.com

Andrew Bard Schmookler


Amazon.com

Shahid Alam


Amazon.com

Ramzy Baroud

Amazon.com
 

James Kunstler 

 

Amazon.com 

Joel Hirschhorn
 
Amazon.com

Jonathan Cook


Amazon.com

Jason Leopold



Amazon.com

Dennis Jett

Amazon.com


Dr. Walter Brasch



Amazon.com



Dave Lindorff

 

Amazon.com 

 

William A. Cook 



Amazon.com 


Rod Amis

 

Amazon.com 

 

Mickey Z

 

Amazon.com 


Mark
Crispin Miller


 

Amazon.com


Expathos
               No account yet?


Page was generated in 0.605703 seconds