Pacific Free Press was launched in March 2007 by Dutch-Canadian Richard
Kastelein of V.O.F. Expathos, in the Netherlands along with Chris Cook- CFUV radio journalist and Editor in Chief of Pacific Free Press. Cook is based in , Victoria, British Columbia.
The site is a sister to Atlantic Free Press and Brick Ogden an American Expatriate in Amsterdam has been a key supporter of this project.
The mission of Pacific Free Press is simple: to dig out nuggets of truth from
the slag-heap of lies, ignorance and witless diversion that has buried
public discourse today. Pacific Free Press provides a new venue for
disseminating hard news and insightful, fact-based analysis of the
harsh realities too often ignored or distorted by the mainstream press.
And Shall it be the Law of the Town? Arresting George W. Bush
And Shall it be the Law of the Town? Arresting George W. Bush
by C. L. Cook What if it's as easy as that; what if stopping the horrors we, the whole of humanity, have witnessed in the person of George W. Bush and his extra-legal operatives these past seven years could be as simple as that?
Kurt Daims
Seven long years; is that not enough suffering endured to atone any sin; long enough to have an end to torment? Kurt Daims of Brattleboro, Vermont thinks so, so he's taking the notion to council of a war crimes indictment, to be sworn out against Bush and Vice President Richard Cheney should they happen by the township.
Daims sums it up neatly:
"There's a fundamental question here. If Congress doesn't do this, shouldn't it be done anyway?"
That is the nub of the issue upon which, more than any other
single one, hangs our modern dilemma: How do we, the people, administer
the law when the administrators abrogate their duty? Don't ask the town
attorney. Bob Fisher doubts putting such an article in the town charter
would make a difference. According to Fisher:
"It is an absolutely unenforceable type of question. The
people in Brattleboro do not have authority to impeach. I don't have
the authority to indict the president, nor do the police have the
ability to arrest him based on such a vote."
It's remarkable, given the gravity of the question, an
American lawyer, and one in public service too, would consider the
American Declaration of Independence not weighty enough an instrument
to address tyranny. More than two hundred and thirty years ago, Thomas
Jefferson put forward a few lines for the consideration of the framers
of the constitution that addressed a similar occasion when a
government failed to represent the best interests and aspirations of
the people it "served."
I'm certain lawyer Fisher is familiar with at
least a line or two of Jefferson's efforts. It starts like this:
"When
in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to
dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and
to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station
to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent
respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare
the causes which impel them to the separation."
Thomas Jefferson
was a president unlike the current incarnation, he being freely and
fairly elected (albeit from "caged" voter lists), but he knew the
potential damage a future president could do should the checks and
balances on absolute power be weakened, or removed altogether.
Jefferson, a curious scholar, scientist, and philosopher, product of
the enlightment that is the foundation of modern western civilization,
was also a prolific reader, and writer. He chose his words carefully,
and we can assume the order of his complaints against the injustices
suffered the American colonists at the hands of the British occupation
were reflected in the Declaration.
Jefferson based much of his
essay on the writings of the English philosopher John Locke, who
maintained "man" was possessed of "natural" rights; that is, he
believed the individual embodies a representation of the whole.
Therefore, injustice done to one was also done to all. He called
these rights "unalienable," which means they cannot be separated from
the individual.
He also argued that it was the government's duty to
protect said individual rights, and that a government could only gain
power through the free consent of the citizenry, who forever hold the
right to abolish any government deemed unjust. These principles are
inherent to the Declaration of Independence and integral to the just
functioning of a democratic America.
Following two hundred and
thirty-one years enjoying the fruits of freedom and liberty within the
walls of the world's longest-lived democracy, lawyer Fisher responds to
T. Jefferson's call for universal justice thus:
"My response is
if you can get me appointed to the U.S. Senate, I would be very
grateful and then I would actually have standing to do something about
this."
Getting elected to the senate is not necessary, the house
of representatives would do. The democrats have the majority in
congress. The representatives can table motions to impeach, as Dennis
Kucinich tabled not so long ago, and they will go through committee,
and perhaps a vote in the house. Then the senate can weigh the issue.
But both houses refuse to recognize the criminality this regime has
employed from day one; (before day one if you consider jerry mandering
the Florida voting rolls, and other pre-2000 election hanky panky).
David
Swanson took on the Herculean task of enumerating the known crimes
against the constitution, and international law committed by the George
W. Bush administrations, and it's longer than your arm. Any one of
these transgressions, many openly acknowledged, would be enough in saner
times to bring down any government, yet they remain.
They remain, though George W. Bush now touts the
lowest approval ratings of any president. His vice president is even
less popular. Americans, most disagreeing with, if not outright despising
their president, have watched the Bush wrecking crew carry on a seven
year looting spree, a dismantling of the nation, while dragging the
flag too through the mire, making of the country a pariah in the eyes
of the world.
It is the time for the winter patriots
Jefferson hoped would sustain the nation to take the mantle, and
remember the second paragraph of his great Declaration:
"We hold
these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that
they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that
among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to
secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving
their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any
Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right
of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new
Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its
powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their
Safety and Happiness."
For Kurt Daims and his Brattleboro,
Vermont confederates, the declaration of Vermont as a no-go state for
profligate legislators on pain of the law could be the first shots of
the next American revolution. Their first paragraph reads:
"Shall
the Selectboard instruct the Town Attorney to draft indictments against
President Bush and Vice President Cheney for crimes against our
Constitution, and publish said indictment for consideration by other
municipalities? And shall it be the law of the Town of Brattleboro that
the Brattleboro Police, pursuant to the above-mentioned indictment,
arrest and detain George Bush and Richard Cheney in Brattleboro and
extradite them to other authorities that may reasonably contend to
prosecute them."
Pass the law anyway. It does not matter if the law will be carried out or not, it only matters that enough people follow in your footsteps. Soon enough everyone will get the idea about what the American people want and after that, this country will be an unsafe place for the Commander In Thief and all his thugs. These are the beginings of justice.