Pacific Free Press was launched in March 2007 by Dutch-Canadian Richard
Kastelein of V.O.F. Expathos, in the Netherlands along with Chris Cook- CFUV radio journalist and Editor in Chief of Pacific Free Press. Cook is based in , Victoria, British Columbia.
The mission of Pacific Free Press is simple: to dig out nuggets of truth from
the slag-heap of lies, ignorance and witless diversion that has buried
public discourse today. Pacific Free Press provides a new venue for
disseminating hard news and insightful, fact-based analysis of the
harsh realities too often ignored or distorted by the mainstream press.
The Gray Lady Gives Bill Kristol and New Lease on Life
by Kurt Nimmo It’s the height of mediocrity. No, scratch that. It’s a prime example of the continuing effort to push the false right-left paradigm.
Bill Kristol, neocon wunderkind, is now a “conservative” voice over at the New York Times. Paul Mulshine, writing for NJ.com, gets it right. “Kristol is in fact a neoconservative,” he declares, although this is also a misrepresentation, as there is no room for the word “conservative” in “neoconservatism.”
As Paul Craig Roberts notes, there “is nothing conservative about neoconservatives. Neocons hide behind ‘conservative’ but they are in fact Jacobins.”
Roberts cites the observation made by Claes Ryn, who conclusively
shows that neocons are, in truth, neo-Jacobins on par with the 18th
century French revolutionaries who were, when put in historical
context, nothing more than psychopathic murderers. “More dangerous an
enemy of the US and its traditional values than Muslims, neo-Jacobins
have seized control of the Bush presidency and US foreign policy. They
will stop at nothing to achieve their goal of World War IV in the
Middle East,” Roberts warns.
Now we have these updated and
thoroughly modern Jacobins spilling their venom from the “newspaper of
record,” the Gray Lady. Naturally, it makes perfect sense.
“Far
from providing balance to the Times’ editorial policy, Kristol fits
squarely within it,” writes Mulshine. “The fight between the neocons
and the liberals has always been an insiders’ game between
Manhattanites. Long before Kristol came along, the Times published the
work of a neocon who had an even bigger role in leading us into the
Iraq War than Kristol and his cohorts at the Weekly Standard.”
Indeed,
as the plan is total war, or rather total destruction of Muslim and
Arab society, a plan shared by both neocons and neolibs, who disagree
on tactics but agree on serial murder.
It should be noted that
there is no such thing as either a “liberal” or “conservative” media,
only a corporate media with a corporate agenda, that is to say a
fascist agenda, as corporatism is fascism, as Mussolini knew. Sure, we
are offered “liberal” and “conservative” window dressing on a few more
or less irrelevant social issues, but when the rubber meets the road
both sides of the false paradigm join the same chorus line.
Inviting
Kristol to jump aboard the New York Times demonstrates all too well
there is basically no difference between neocons and neolibs, as should
be obvious in hindsight with the invasion of Iraq smoldering in the
foreground. “His hiring represents a continuation of a tradition that
has been prominent at the paper since before the Iraq invasion. It
wasn’t just [Judith] Miller. Neocon columnist William Safire was one of
the biggest cheerleaders for the invasion.” Of course, any significant
opposition to this was disallowed by the Gray Lady.
“As a real
conservative commentator, one of the few non-neocons at a major
newspaper, I for one don’t mind in the least if the Times wants to hire
another big-government left-winger for its opinion page. But don’t call
a radical a conservative,” Mr. Mulshine concludes.
Sort of, although I’d drop that archaic “left-wing” descriptor. Again, at the sake of coming off as redundant, there is no difference between neocons and neolibs, or little difference. And that’s why Bill Kristol is a perfect fit at the New York Times.
For the neocons, it is a step in the right direction, as Kristol’s rag, the Weekly Standard, consistently loses an astounding one million per year and would be flotsam headed for a landfill if not for the benevolence of Rupert Murdoch, who apparently likes to fund losing ventures.
why no comments ? every one just overwhelmed by what now-ness of a well orchestrated puppet mastered society , where it is not clear if people like Chomski my be working for the controllers, were every group can be controlled and led by the nose and people jump on to the bandwagon of the Propagandist. See Global Warming for example .
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
... written by Kate,
January 02, 2008
Astoundingly accurate article, now if more of the brainwashed so called "conservatives" who are actually Jacobin Neocon liberals will be able to compute this information into their Bill Kristol/Sean Hannity warmongering little minds . Maybe one day they will see that they have been duped. Oh well, I can hope for miracles can't I?
Writings 
It’s the height of mediocrity. No, scratch that. It’s a prime example of the continuing effort to push the false right-left paradigm. 
Sort of, although I’d drop that archaic “left-wing” descriptor. Again, at the sake of coming off as redundant, there is no difference between neocons and neolibs, or little difference. And that’s why Bill Kristol is a perfect fit at the New York Times. 
Subscribe to this comment's feed
by what now-ness of a well orchestrated puppet
mastered society , where it is not clear if people
like Chomski my be working for the controllers, were
every group can be controlled and led by the nose
and people jump on to the bandwagon of the Propagandist.
See Global Warming for example .