Pacific Free Press was launched in March 2007 by Dutch-Canadian Richard
Kastelein of V.O.F. Expathos, in the Netherlands along with Chris Cook- CFUV radio journalist and Editor in Chief of Pacific Free Press. Cook is based in , Victoria, British Columbia.
The mission of Pacific Free Press is simple: to dig out nuggets of truth from
the slag-heap of lies, ignorance and witless diversion that has buried
public discourse today. Pacific Free Press provides a new venue for
disseminating hard news and insightful, fact-based analysis of the
harsh realities too often ignored or distorted by the mainstream press.
Bye-Bye Coke, Hello Pepsi - Anatomy of the Midterms
The big losers on Election Day were of course President Bush and the Republican Party, but there was another loser too: the conspiracy theory that had it that a slick operation run out of Karl Rove’s office, and working in cahoots with the makers of the electronic voting machines increasingly being installed by voting districts around the country would steal the key elections electronically.
I always felt that this conspiracy theory was over the top, and that it moreover was having the pernicious effect of creating massive cynicism about elections that would keep many people from voting who otherwise might have.
There's no way to know how many people didn't go to the polls because they decided that it would be a waste of time, but I sure have heard plenty of people saying, over the past year, "What's the point? The Republicans are going to steal the election anyway."
Well, if they were ever going to steal an election, this would have been the one to do it to. The last thing a criminal president whose popularity is in the cellar needs is a Congress armed with subpoena power in the hands of the opposition party. Surely, if Karl Rove could have tinkered with the numbers on those voting machines in just a few dozen districts, or in states like Montana or Virginia where the margin was a few thousand votes, and where the key voter registrar officials were fellow Republicans, he would have done it.
Instead, we saw dozens of congressional races and a handful of key Senate races switch to the Democrats, and sometimes by the narrowest of margins.
I am certain that Rove and his legions of dirty tricksters did their
level best to intimidate and discourage minority and low-income urban
voters from going to the polls. Greg Palast and others have ably
demonstrated how Republicans have mastered the art of removing people
from the rolls who should not be removed, of tricking people into
thinking they'd registered to vote when they hadn't, and of threatening
some groups of voters--mostly blacks and Hispanics--into not voting for
fear of being arrested on some trumped-up charge. There have also been
plenty of documented cases of Republican Party attempts to establish
burdensome and illegal photo ID requirements. All these things have
certainly lowered Democratic vote totals by millions of votes.
But the systematic tampering with voting machines that some warned
would happen and that people have claimed happened in 2004 and 2000,
simply didn't occur--and I suspect didn't occur those years either.
I’m not saying it couldn't be done from a purely technical point of
view. Techies at Princeton have proven that the machines made by
Diebold can be hacked. Others have hacked machines made by Sequoia
Systems. And certainly if ATM machines can be made reasonably safe and
reliable, voting machines should be able to be made equally so. But all
that being said, showing it can be done, and actually having it done
are two very different things.
Certainly the idea of having elections that use electronic voting
machines which keep no paper record of votes is stupid and is just
asking for trouble. Just consider the election district where a voting
official forgot to push "save" to record the vote totals before turning
off the machine! Or consider the Virginia Senate race, where they can't
really do a recount even if Sen. Allen wants one, because a third of
the voting machines have no paper record of what voters did. We don't
do our ATM business without a receipt, or buy gas at a pump by credit
card without a receipt, so why on earth would we accept the idea of
voting without a receipt?
So let's fix the system so it has a verifiable paper trail.
But let's also stop the paranoia about massive vote-stealing conspiracies.
Karl Rove is about as much a genius as George Bush is a talented
leader. The sinking ship of the Bush administration and the Republican
Party is proving that. The way I see it, if you can be beaten by the
current Democratic Party, you've got to be pretty pathetic!
Instead of telling people that the Republicans are going to hack the
vote, we should be telling people that voting is a critical
responsibility. We should also be fixing the election system so that
the real threats to a fair vote--the impediments to voting that we know
are being erected by Republicans--become illegal.
I can appreciate the thigh slapping 'schedenfraude' of progressive's everywhere watching Bush and his Fourth Reich cohorts licking their electoral wounds but I fear it may be very short lived.
Fact - the electronic voting machines can be easily rigged. If there was any genuine concern to truly protect the validity of the democratic mandate there would be a simple 'cash point' style paper trail. There isn't and with Democrats now bracing themselves to become kings of the hill, the momentum to protect the integrity of elections will slip down the agenda.
I'm disappointed by articles like this which uses the hackneyed "conspiracy" label to undermine those people who's main concern is the integrity of the elections.
Surely good sites like this should be doing all they can to support this cause.
Yeah let's all whoop at Rumsfield's bloodied scalp but also be careful of a 2008 knock-out sucker punch.
The USA has switched brands. It went from Coke to Pepsi, but guess what - inside the American 'body politik' - it's still rotten.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Naive again?! written by Griffon,
November 12, 2006
This is the second article this week that disputes the conspiracy view of electoral rigging. What's going on?
That the 2000 and 2004 elections were stolen is beyond dispute. That the voting machines were hacked is beyond dispute. It has been shown how it was done.
If this article was in the NYT or WaPo, I would not see it as unusual, but here on this site for thinking ans informed readers, I have to ask what the agenda is.
Writings 
The big losers on Election Day were of course President Bush and the Republican Party, but there was another loser too: the conspiracy theory that had it that a slick operation run out of Karl Rove’s office, and working in cahoots with the makers of the electronic voting machines increasingly being installed by voting districts around the country would steal the key elections electronically. 
Subscribe to this comment's feed
Fact - the electronic voting machines can be easily rigged. If there was any genuine concern to truly protect the validity of the democratic mandate there would be a simple 'cash point' style paper trail. There isn't and with Democrats now bracing themselves to become kings of the hill, the momentum to protect the integrity of elections will slip down the agenda.
I'm disappointed by articles like this which uses the hackneyed "conspiracy" label to undermine those people who's main concern is the integrity of the elections.
Surely good sites like this should be doing all they can to support this cause.
Yeah let's all whoop at Rumsfield's bloodied scalp but also be careful of a 2008 knock-out sucker punch.
The USA has switched brands. It went from Coke to Pepsi, but guess what - inside the American 'body politik' - it's still rotten.