Pacific Free Press was launched in March 2007 by Dutch-Canadian Richard
Kastelein of V.O.F. Expathos, in the Netherlands along with Chris Cook- CFUV radio journalist and Editor in Chief of Pacific Free Press. Cook is based in , Victoria, British Columbia.
The site is a sister to Atlantic Free Press and Brick Ogden an American Expatriate in Amsterdam has been a key supporter of this project.
The mission of Pacific Free Press is simple: to dig out nuggets of truth from
the slag-heap of lies, ignorance and witless diversion that has buried
public discourse today. Pacific Free Press provides a new venue for
disseminating hard news and insightful, fact-based analysis of the
harsh realities too often ignored or distorted by the mainstream press.
When actress Farrah Fawcett recently sought out "alternative" cancer treatment, she was greeted with predictable media scorn.
For example, ABCNews.com (October 3) characterized such a choice as a "last-ditch attempt to find a cure, one that brings the patient into a murky world of offshore clinics and unproven courses of treatment that are scorned by the medical establishment."
Speaking of the "medical establishment," ABC News quoted Barrie
Cassileth, chief of the Integrative Medicine Department at Memorial
Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Cassileth said patients pursuing
"alternative" approaches are "signing their own death certificate." Dr.
Cassileth added: "I would say they are wasting time they could
otherwise spend happier and with their families."
Almost
600,000 Americans die of cancer each yearroughly 1500 per dayand a
new case is diagnosed every seven seconds. Yet, the Western medical
priesthood stigmatizes alternatives and aggressively defends its Holy
Trinity of cancer treatment: surgery, radiation, and of course,
chemotherapy.
"We've been told that it's only the treatments of
orthodox medicine that have passed careful scientific scrutiny
involving double-blind placebo-controlled studies," write Gary Null and
Dr. Debora Rasio. "Concomitantly, we've been told that alternative or
complementary health care has no science to back it up, only anecdotal
evidence. These two ideas have led to the widely accepted 'truths' that
anyone offering an alternative or complementary approach is depriving
patients of the proven benefits of safe and effective care, and that
people not only don't get well with alternative care, but are actually
endangered by it."
This includes the doctors themselves. As
reported by John Robbins in Reclaiming Our Health, the percentage of
oncologists who, if they had cancer, would not participate in
chemotherapy trials due to its "ineffectiveness and its unacceptable
toxicity" is 75%. Conversely, the percentage of Americans with cancer
that receive chemotherapy isyou guessed it: 75%.
By odd
coincidence, there was another October 3 ABCNews.com story on the topic
of cancer. It seems a Long Island woman was told she had breast cancer,
underwent a double mastectomy, and then learned that the lab made a
mistake. She didn't have cancer. Deemed a "mix-up," the whole thing was
blamed on "a technician who admitted cutting corners while labeling
tissue specimens."
Obviously, "murky" and "unproven" are in
the eye of the beholder. But until American health care consumers move
toward awareness, self-education, and prevention, all they're doing is
debating which pen to use when "signing their own death certificate."
Mickey Z. can be found on the Web at http://www.mickeyz.net