Pacific Free Press was launched in March 2007 by Dutch-Canadian Richard
Kastelein of V.O.F. Expathos, in the Netherlands along with Chris Cook- CFUV radio journalist and Editor in Chief of Pacific Free Press. Cook is based in , Victoria, British Columbia.
The mission of Pacific Free Press is simple: to dig out nuggets of truth from
the slag-heap of lies, ignorance and witless diversion that has buried
public discourse today. Pacific Free Press provides a new venue for
disseminating hard news and insightful, fact-based analysis of the
harsh realities too often ignored or distorted by the mainstream press.
Pravda of the South: Birmingham News and the Crucifiction of Don Siegelman
The Bham News Revs Up the Slime Machine
by Scott Horton A No Comment reader who works at the Birmingham News tells us that a certain editor and writer at the illustrious Pravda of the South are royally pissed off at Representative Artur Davis.
It seems that Daviss questions and press releases on the Siegelman case are making a decisive difference in pushing the matter forward. And the reputation of the News, which has played a key role in the anti-Siegelman campaign by giving press cover to the cabal and by disseminating and lending unwarranted credibility to claims of the prosecutors who front for it, is on the line.
So whats the answer? According to my source, the word went out: Slime Artur Davis. If you cant hit him personally, at least slime some senior aide who works for him. Do it quickly.
I am told that the News will use one its marquee writers for
this, probably one who has been deep in the anti-Siegelman vendetta.
Also, the News has been busily pouring over the list of Daviss
staffers, family and other associates to find someone it can land a
blow against, hopefully in time for the Sunday edition.
The
message that the News wants to deliver is simple: Davis, youll shut up
if you know whats good for you. The right adjective for this conduct:
thuggery. By a newspaper, moreover. Note: they wont lift a finger to
look into any of the Simpson allegationsall they do is shovel lies
attempting to discredit Simspon. And, it seems, anyone else who raises
questions about the matter.
It brought back some old memories.
Back in the late Soviet period, I worked for Andrei Sakharov and his
wife, Elena Bonner, helping out whenever I could, and mostly keeping
anxious track of their welfare in a harsh and threatening environment.
I remember that when the authorities were angry at Sakharov, they had a
number of tools they could use for a sort of graduated response. And
one of their favorite tools was to have the media launch an
attacksometimes on Sakharov directly. But there was a problem with
that. After all, Sakharov was a sacrosanct figure, a hero. They didnt
want to publicize the fact that he was critical of them. So it was much
easier to take target at someone close to Sakharov. And the favorite
target was his wife, Elena Bonnerperhaps the bravest and most
determined human rights advocate I ever had the privilege to work with.
One of the most striking incidents related to the Efim
Davidovich, a Holocaust survivor and then Red Army colonel who sought
and was denied permission to emigrate to Israel, and thus became a
refusenik. Davidovich played a key role in documenting and publicizing
events of shocking anti-Semitism in the former Soviet Union, including
one particular incidentthe murder of a 14-year-old boy by a group of
teenagers whipped into an anti-Semitic rage. But in the view of the
justice authorities, there was no anti-Semitism, and the shocking
circumstances of the case were therefore officially suppressed.
Davidovich
returned his medals as an act of protest over the failure to examine
and prosecute this case. And Sakharov and Bonner met with Col.
Davidovich to discuss how to advance his case.
In response,
and as a caution to get Sakharov to shut up, Pravda published an attack
on Elena Bonner, decrying her anti-Soviet behavior. She was
complaining about the fairness of Soviet justice; she was suggesting
that there was anti-Semitism; therefore she was disloyal to the state
and deserved to be scapegoated. Sakharov describes this episode in
pages 443-45 of his Memoirs.
History, alas, so often repeats
itself. In essence what Bonner and Sakharov had done was expose a gross
injustice and demand that it be fixed. And that is exactly what Artur
Davis has done. But for those who cower in the shadows and who thrive
off of this injustice, that was a threatening act. It warranted a reply
blow. And tomorrow let us scrutinize the News closely and see if we
dont find the echo of Pravda that I fully anticipate will appear in
its pages.
http://www.harpers.org/subject...BlogEntry
Archive for Researchers, Media and Scholars
http://www.donsiegelman.org
TPMmuckraker Archive
http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/ar...siegelman/
Gorilla Radio with Chris Cook interviewing Scott Horton, Sept. 10, 2007
http://atlanticfreepress.com/loudblog/get.php?web=AFP-2007-09-11-30686.mp3