How this historic calamity happened one of the most
under-reported events of modern times is the centerpiece of our new
book,
Neck Deep: The Disastrous Presidency of George W. Bush, which
looks at the roles of aggressive Republicans, accommodating Democrats,
bullying pundits and careerist journalists.
But the fact that
the eclipse of the Republic did happen has gained more corroboration
from a new book by Jack Goldsmith, the former chief of the Justice
Departments Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) who clashed with senior
White House lawyers over their expansive interpretation of presidential
power.
Were going to push and push and push until some larger
force makes us stop, explained Vice Presidents Dick Cheneys legal
counsel David Addington, according to Goldsmiths new book, The Terror
Presidency.
Goldsmith wrote that Addington and, I presumed, his boss viewed power as the absence of constraint.
However,
the absence of constraint in the context of political leaders
wielding the extraordinary authority of a powerful state is synonymous
with tyranny, the antithesis of a democratic Republic with checks and
balances, rule of law and respect for the will of an informed
electorate.
This Bush tyranny combined its lust for unrestrained
power with a parallel contempt for logic and objective information,
becoming what might be called an imperial presidency in an
anti-empirical world. Rationality and legality were brushed aside;
action and toughness were all that mattered.
Even as President
Bush stripped away the inalienable rights guaranteed by the Founders in
the Constitution, he kept much of the population confused with
misdirection, by asserting that he was taking these actions to defend
"liberty" and "freedom."
In spring 2003, after becoming
assistant attorney general at the influential Office of Legal Counsel,
Goldsmith encountered the administrations sophistry in the legal
opinions that were the cornerstones of Bushs claims of virtually
unlimited presidential power in wartime.
As I absorbed the
opinions, I concluded that some were deeply flawed, sloppily reasoned,
overbroad, and incautious in asserting extraordinary constitutional
authorities on behalf of the President, wrote Goldsmith, who regards
himself as a conservative Republican though with a rational bent.
Goldsmith
also was stunned to encounter the ideological extremism of Bushs White
House, which chafed at even the modest limits put on Bushs spying
power by the secret court created in 1978 by the Foreign Intelligence
Surveillance Act (FISA).
In one February 2004 meeting, Addington
remarked, Were one bomb away from getting rid of that obnoxious
[FISA] court, according to Goldsmiths book.
The very idea that
a senior government official would, even flippantly, welcome a
terrorist attack as a way to panic the American people and further
enhance Bushs powers underscores how contemptuous the White House had
become of the Founders vision of a constitutional Republic based on
law and reason.
No Dissent
Bushs White House also would
brook no dissent from legal experts within the Justice Department. When
Goldsmith questioned the legal reasoning behind Bushs unilateral
decision to waive the Geneva Conventions in regard to the war on
terror, Addington lashed out angrily.
The President has
already decided that terrorists do not receive Geneva Convention
protections, Addington snapped. You cannot question his decision.
But
Goldsmith proved to be a gutsy if short-lived bureaucratic
infighter. When he suspended a legal opinion that permitted harsh
interrogations of detainees, he did so without giving the White House
advance warning.
On another occasion, when Goldsmith torpedoed a
memo that permitted torture by narrowly defining it, he timed his move
with the delivery of his resignation letter so the administration would
find it tricky to reverse his opinion without drawing unwanted
attention to the internal dispute.
Goldsmith left his influential position at the Office of Legal Counsel in July 2004 to return to academia.
Though
the resistance from Goldsmith and a few others did complicate Bushs
consolidation of unlimited presidential power, the amassing of
executive authority has continued to advance in the three years since
Goldsmith left.
In September 2006, for instance, the
Republican-controlled Congress pushed through the Military Commissions
Act, which in effect creates an extra-constitutional legal system for
handling a wide range of cases that Bush asserts involve unlawful
enemy combatants and their accomplices, whether foreign or domestic.
Even
after Democrats wrested control of Congress from the Republicans in
November 2006, Bush continued to expand his powers. In May 2007, the
Bush administration reversed long-standing legal policies and cleared
the way for using powerful spy satellites against domestic targets.
Also
in spring 2007, Congress acquiesced to giving Bush another blank check
to fund the Iraq War. Then, just before the August recess, Democrats
caved in to Bushs demands for even more sweeping authority to spy on
Americans who communicate or travel abroad.
So, the larger
questions have yet to be resolved: Can Bushs pursuit of what Goldsmith
termed the absence of constraint be halted and reversed? Will some
larger force finally materialize to stop the pushing from Addington
and other Bush loyalists?
Can the great American Republic be salvaged and revived?