Pacific Free Press was launched in March 2007 by Dutch-Canadian Richard
Kastelein of V.O.F. Expathos, in the Netherlands along with Chris Cook- CFUV radio journalist and Editor in Chief of Pacific Free Press. Cook is based in , Victoria, British Columbia.
The site is a sister to Atlantic Free Press and Brick Ogden an American Expatriate in Amsterdam has been a key supporter of this project.
The mission of Pacific Free Press is simple: to dig out nuggets of truth from
the slag-heap of lies, ignorance and witless diversion that has buried
public discourse today. Pacific Free Press provides a new venue for
disseminating hard news and insightful, fact-based analysis of the
harsh realities too often ignored or distorted by the mainstream press.
In the summer of 2007, I have reached the winter of my discontent. Like the Diaspora of New Orleans, I have walked a long, hard road to reach the light at the end of the tunnel only to find there is no light.
I am a solitary thinker. I move to the offbeat. I was born on a left curve and raised with a paradoxical attraction and aversion to the political process. I was the kid at the back of the class who questioned authority and explored uninhabited avenues of thought.
For as long as I can recall, I have held out hope that democracy, the will of the people and the cause of justice could triumph over the forces of corruption.
I have fought against myself so long, believing that a dissenting point of view could become mainstream if only we spoke loud enough, long enough, if only we were persuasive enough, if only our message could beat to the rhythm of the masses, we could prevail.
JAZZMAN CHRONICLES: DISSEMINATE FREELY
I believed the body politic was like a giant roulette wheel and
the finger of fortune would inevitably land on our number if only we
could stay in the game.
I predicted the 2004 election fix
before it happened. I called for civil divide in Iraq long before
Senator Joe Biden proposed partitioning. I foresaw the neocon nightmare
of invading and occupying a Middle Eastern nation. I condemned the war
on terrorism, the doctrine of aggressive war, the invasion of
Afghanistan, the conquest of Iraq, the erosion of civil liberties, the
danger of an imperial White House, the betrayal of the working class
and the degradation of our environment long before it was popular or
even acceptable to do so.
I warned America that the Enron
scandal was a microcosm of the national economy and the housing boom
was the second coming of the technology bust of 2002. I warned that the
west coast energy crisis was a symptom of a corrupt government in
collusion with powerful corporate interests and that nothing had been
done to treat the underlying disease.
I predicted the ever
expanding definition of terrorists and the necessity of reinstating a
military draft to forward the neocon war plan, a reality that is
currently being aired.
Above all, I warned America that the
major political parties were two sides of the same coin, financed by
the same corporate interests and corrupt to the core.
I can attest that there is little consolation is being proven right.
On
Monday, August 13, 2007, the New York Times published an editorial that
effectively defines the bipartisan mainstream position on the war in
Iraq. While acknowledging that our ill-conceived and morally bankrupt
invasion created the crisis we now face (an invasion the Times promoted
as a fence for the White House), it argues that we can neither withdraw
nor reduce our forces in the foreseeable future.
The Times
should be ashamed but an institution that has systematically purged
integrity is not capable of such an emotion. The Times is no longer an
independent voice but the leading member of the third branch of the
corporate propaganda machine.
This is exactly what the
neocons had in mind. They knew the probability of immediate success was
a pipe dream fed to a gullible public. They knew that once they
committed us to war, the prize -- a stronghold in the Arabian oil
fields and practical control of a plentiful supply of oil -- would be
too enticing for the opposition party to turn away.
The Democrats will not end the war. Neither party will end the occupation.
The
leading Democratic candidates for president have positioned themselves
for all contingencies. Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and John Edwards
have appeased the antiwar camp with vague promises of a draw down in
troop levels while simultaneously appeasing the corporate warlords with
assurances that we will maintain a military presence in occupied Iraq.
None has questioned the Iraqi oil agreement that effectively hands
control to international corporations. None has pledged to dismantle
our multi-billion dollar fortresses or even hinted that we should.
That
is all our enemies in the Middle East need to know. Even our allies in
the Arab world will secretly oppose us, just as we would any foreign
power that attempted to take control of our resources.
It is
all Al Qaeda needs to keep its once marginal movement alive. As long as
America remains on Iraqi soil, usurping Iraqi oil, the war will go on.
That is exactly what the neocons had in mind.
I
have not always been right in my political machinations. I supported
the Democratic presidential nominee in 2004 (though I voted for Leonard
Peltier). I withheld my strongest criticism of the Democrats in 2006.
What
have I gained for my pragmatism? A hopelessly incomprehensible John
Kerry lost to electoral fraud and failed to issue a protest. The
Democrats took control of congress and immediately discarded their only
means of ending the war: appropriations and impeachment.
Soon
the presidential field will be narrowed by eliminating the truth
tellers: Congressman Dennis Kucinich, former Senator Mike Gravel and
Republican Congressman Ron Paul. In a practical sense, they have
already been so marginalized they are all but invisible. They speak but
no one hears. They tell hard truths that are instantly dismissed. They
represent the views of a swelling mass of Americans yet they are
regarded as naïve little children who have yet to learn their manners
in the company of adults.
A thousand clichés land at my fingertips: end of the line, the last straw, the final betrayal, rock bottom.
There
is a certain contentment that visits ones soul after surrender. I have
discovered something uplifting in accepting the immortal sadness of the
human experience. I am liberated from the twisted, confining,
suffocating madness of moral dilemma, a madness that has poisoned my
vision and held me in its paralyzing grip for all these many years.
I have discovered the sweetness of irony, the joy of giving in, giving up and accepting the eternal struggle.
I am free at last to support Ron Paul, Mike Gravel, Dennis Kucinich, Ralph Nader or Leonard Peltier without apology or remorse.
I
am free at last to speak the truths that flow from my heart. I am free
to admit that I do not have all the answers but I am certain of this
much: Until a plurality of Americans reject the fallacy of the two
party system, our democracy will remain profoundly flawed and our
government will fail to represent either the interests or the will of
the people.
Come November 2008, millions of Americans will
not vote. Millions more will vote for a candidate they do not believe
in. I will vote my conscience.
While others are watching the
returns of the presidential contest, perhaps to see where the next
fraud will turn, I will be examining state and local elections for
promising independent candidates.
In them lies the hope of American democracy.
Jazz.
JACK
RANDOM IS THE AUTHOR OF THE JAZZMAN CHRONICLES (CROW DOG PRESS) AND
GHOST DANCE INSURRECTION (DRY BONES PRESS). HIS COMMENTARIES HAVE BEEN
POSTED ON THE ALBION MONITOR, COUNTERPUNCH, DISSIDENT VOICE AND PACIFIC
FREE PRESS. SEE HIS BLOG: WWW.JAZZMANCHRONICLES.BLOGSPOT.COM
Liberty is the Goal. written by a guest,
August 18, 2007
Liberty is an ideal that nearly everyone supports. (Excepting the well-intentioned meddlers and ill-intentioned tyrants).
Democracy, on the other hand, may be over-rated. On old cliche perhaps best illustrates the problem: "Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what to eat for lunch".
That is why our Constitution is so brilliant. It established a system under which the Federal government has only limited, enumerated powers. All rights not explicitly given to the Federal government are reserved by the people and the member States. The rule of law (our Constitution) protects us from arbitrary actions of both government officials and mob rule (also known as "Democracy").
When Benjamin Franklin was asked, outside the Constitutional Convention, what sort of government had been formed, he answered, "A Republic, if you can keep it."
Well, perhaps we have not kept it. Our Liberties are imperiled and our Constitution is ignored.
That is why Dr. Ron Paul's message resonates with so many Americans. He is the only presidential candidate who has been unwavering in his promotion of Liberty and his defense of the Constitution. He understands that a return to Constitutional principles will give people the means and incentives to pursue their own personal versions of happiness. Government will no longer be for sale, because it will no longer have the power to meddle in the affairs of people here or abroad.
A vote for Dr. Paul is not a vote for the man, but, rather, a vote for Liberty, protected by the Rule of Law. I would be throwing my vote away if I voted for anything else.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Don't give up hope written by a guest,
August 18, 2007
I'm glad to see you feel you can now vote with your conscience, but you aren't alone. In many campaigns, including the Ron Paul campaign with which I work as a volunteer, people, especially young people, are stepping up to do their part in taking America back.
It is difficult, yes; beyond hope, never. :)
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
all that jazzman written by a guest,
August 18, 2007
there is an old saying'no matter who the people vote for,they always vote for me.....there was a third party(concieved in 1790)they held their first national covention in philidelphia 9/11 1830....the anti-masonic party.you probaly never learned that at school.... rest assured,that there are many of us,the coalition of the unwilling,that knew the decisions being made by our governing body......were a ticket to hell in a bucket. the zappacrat
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Great Article! written by a guest,
August 18, 2007
The mainstream has convinced people not to "waste" their vote on a candidate that won't win. They claim they can only use their precious airtime to cover candidates that have the ability to win. The only candidates that have the ability to win are the ones the media widely cover. The only way for a unknown like Ron Paul to win, is for a grassroots revolution to occur. Unfortunately, the faster the revolution grows, the faster the media machine and their backers tighten the noose. This will not deter me, as I will not participate in their self fulfilling prophecy!
Democracy, on the other hand, may be over-rated. On old cliche perhaps best illustrates the problem: "Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what to eat for lunch".
That is why our Constitution is so brilliant. It established a system under which the Federal government has only limited, enumerated powers. All rights not explicitly given to the Federal government are reserved by the people and the member States. The rule of law (our Constitution) protects us from arbitrary actions of both government officials and mob rule (also known as "Democracy").
When Benjamin Franklin was asked, outside the Constitutional Convention, what sort of government had been formed, he answered, "A Republic, if you can keep it."
Well, perhaps we have not kept it. Our Liberties are imperiled and our Constitution is ignored.
That is why Dr. Ron Paul's message resonates with so many Americans. He is the only presidential candidate who has been unwavering in his promotion of Liberty and his defense of the Constitution. He understands that a return to Constitutional principles will give people the means and incentives to pursue their own personal versions of happiness. Government will no longer be for sale, because it will no longer have the power to meddle in the affairs of people here or abroad.
A vote for Dr. Paul is not a vote for the man, but, rather, a vote for Liberty, protected by the Rule of Law. I would be throwing my vote away if I voted for anything else.