|
Don't Go Too Far Away, Cindy
The Exit of Cindy Sheehan
by RON JACOBS
I have to admit that I was quite surprised when I read that Cindy Sheehan is leaving the peace movement. After reading her explanation for the move, I was less surprised, but still a bit disappointed.
After reading the piece, it is clear that Sheehan has discovered that politics can be an ugly affair. When one is the focus of a political movement like Ms. Sheehan became, they become even uglier. Her departure will leave a hole, but it should not leave a vacuum.
After all, there are thousands of US residents that have been
hurt by the loss of a loved one in Iraq or Afghanistan, unfortunately.
In addition, there are millions around the world that are just plain
fed up and pissed off about these wars and the death and destruction
they are causing.
Ms. Sheehan is planning to go home and raise
her remaining children. That's a good thing. Her screed makes it clear
that she is burned out from her past two years of antiwar activism and
doing something real like caring for children will surely put her back
in touch with the better side of humanity. This move is similar to the
retreat from politics and the streets that much of an entire generation
underwent in the years following the government murders at Kent State
and Jackson State in 1970 during antiwar protests.
Another side of this
retreat was the turn away from politics and towards cultural and
religion. Unlike caring for one's children, the latter two were mere
escapism and somewhat solipsistic. One could argue that these
phenomenon destroyed the potential for radical change in the United
States, but a more appropriate analysis would merely claim that here in
the US we had (and have) the luxury to stop fighting against the war
because we do not live where the bombs are exploding and the assault
weapons firing.
Ms. Sheehan makes it clear that she still
opposes these wars and the power mongers who insist on continuing it.
Indeed, she saves her harshest words of her farewell message for these
men and women who "move them (US soldiers) around like pawns on a
chessboard of destruction" and are " worried more about elections than
people." Naturally, this includes the Democrats as well as the
Republicans. And that, is the crux of Sheehan's despair.
She honestly
thought that the Democrats were different. Now that they have proved
they are not, she is ready to give it all up and, by doing so, hand the
forces of war and reaction a victory that they will surely relish.
Yeh,
there will probably be some tentative cries from various Democrats
telling Cindy that their party is not a war party and that she needs to
hang in there. Those cries will most likely come from party rank and
file, not its leaders or elected types, since the latter are much more
concerned with the 2008 elections, as Sheehan clearly points out.
Meanwhile, one can almost imagine the nasty jokes and high-fives going
around George Bush's breakfast table. They finally got rid of that
pesky Mom whose son they killed. Maybe now they can get on with the
war, especially since the Democrats caved like a cardboard box in a
hurricane.
In another section of her letter, Sheehan directs her
anger and frustration at the so-called leadership of the antiwar
movement. Pointing a well-deserved finger at the movement and its
divisions, she writes:
" I have also tried to work within a peace
movement that often puts personal egos above peace and human life. This
group won't work with that group; he won't attend an event if she is
going to be there.... It is hard to work for peace when the very
movement that is named after it has so many divisions."
What else can
one say except, once again Ms. Sheehan has drawn an incorrect
conclusion. As many others have written when addressing this issue, who
cares about the pettiness of egos and power players in the movement? If
one opposes the war, one gets in the streets and opposes it. Screw the
fools jockeying for a future or a media spot. The war will be ended by
the mass protest of the people who oppose it, not by getting a
director's job with MoveOn, UFPJ, or some other antiwar organization.
The
most poignant paragraph in Sheehan's statement begins with her sad
acknowledgment that her son died for absolutely nothing. One can only
imagine the emotions that come from this realization. Like many of her
fellow citizens, Sheehan wants to believe that the United States is a
good place and that the people who live there do believe in the
principles espoused in its documents and by its greatest leaders. Her
discovery that
"(her son) Casey died for a country which cares more
about who will be the next American Idol than how many people will be
killed in the next few months" is a difficult thing to take.
Yet, this
is not a reason to quit. It is, instead, a motivation to change things
at an even more fundamental level. One may not like being called a
radical because they oppose the wars Washington has dragged us into,
but one must also become aware that only radical analysis and action
undertaken by millions will change a system that requires those wars to
survive.
I recall a discussion I had with a friend during the
buildup to the first Gulf War. We were talking about activist burnout
and egotistical activists as we watched the antiwar movement in
Olympia, WA. grow by leaps and bounds while it struggled with internal
conflicts that were primarily ego-driven. I said to my friend that
whenever I felt an organization couldn't live without me, then it was
time for me to step back from whatever high-profile position I happened
to be in and go back to the grunt work of passing out leaflets and
setting up stages. After all, it wasn't me that mattered, but the
movement.
I wish Cindy Sheehan a peaceful and restorative time
away from the frontlines of the antiwar movement. Her presence,
commitment and personality have made a good deal of difference in the
growth of the movement against Washington's wars. Indeed, it can be
reasonably argued that it was Cindy Sheehan that made it okay for
Middle America to protest, and for that she must be thanked. Now that
she is taking a breather from the madness it is up to us to continue
expanding those protests. It is certainly not time to give up.
Ron
Jacobs is author of The Way the Wind Blew: a history of the Weather
Underground, which is just republished by Verso. Jacobs' essay on Big
Bill Broonzy is featured in CounterPunch's collection on music, art and
sex, Serpents in the Garden. His first novel, Short Order Frame Up, is
forthcoming from Mainstay Press. He can be reached at:
rjacobs3625@charter.net
|