Considering what the Bush regime has accomplished in terms of its
own carnage and that of its Israeli puppeteer, for my Arab friend to
express a view often heard 35 years ago was - under current
circumstances - quite generous.
Much too generous from this American critic's point of view.
Arabs
tend to forget at times that America still lays claim to being a
democracy, proud to have embraced Abraham Lincoln's reference to a
government "of the people, for the people and by the people". It's no
longer any of those things.
Joel S. Hirschborn recently asked,
"When you can no longer trust the elected representatives what happens
to American democracy? His response: "It becomes an oxymoron." An
oxymoron is a contradiction in terms, like military justice" or a
"just war".
Hirschborn added:
We have arrived at a
delusional democracy. Delusional because Americans overwhelmingly
cannot admit the painful truth that their limited democracy no longer
works for the good of most citizens. Instead, through corruption and
dishonesty, our representative democracy has morphed into a plutocracy
that serves the wealthy, power elites and corporate masters that
control the political system and through that the economic system.1
If
the government is not "for the people", how did it become a plutocracy
that serves "the wealthy, power elites and corporate masters"? Could
that happen if the government was "of the people"?
It should be
clear from the inaction of a Congress recently voted to represent the
electorate's wishes to leave Iraq that the government is not of the
people.
In "An Open Letter to the President
Four and a Half Years Later",

Sean Penn wrote:
because,
in the absence of a competent or brave Congress, of a mobilized
citizenry, that level of power lies in your hands, it is you who have
misused it to become our country's and our constitution's most
devastating enemy. You have broken our country and our hearts. The
needless blood on your hands, and therefore, on our own, is drowning
the freedom, the security, and the dream that America might have been,
once healed of and awakened by, the tragedy of September 11, 2001.2
When
2 per cent of the American population controls the country, no one can
claim that America has a democracy "by the people".
Is it democracy when 2 per cent of the population effectively
controls the government and media? This is the democracy that the
plutocrats in charge want to impose on other countries.
According
to George Soros, in an article on "Israel, America and AIPAC, it is a
lobby "which strongly affects both the Democratic and the Republican
parties. AIPAC's mission is to ensure American support for Israel but
in recent years it has overreached itself."3 Later, Soros added, "Any
politician who dares to expose AIPAC's influence would incur its wrath;
so very few can be expected to do so."
In an earlier article, Juan Cole made it clear that the AIPAC influence on Congress has been ongoing:
With
regard to the Arab-Israeli conflict, the American Israel Public Affairs
Committee and a few allies have succeeded in imposing complete
censorship on both houses of Congress. No Senator or Representative
dares make a speech on the floor of his or her institution critical of
Israeli policy, even though the Israeli government often violates
international law and UN Security Council resolutions.4
If
AIPAC, representing 2 per cent of the American public controls the
American government, how can anyone claim that it's a government "by
the people"?
Some still call it "democracy". Is it a democracy
for, of, or by the people when a presidential candidate must humble
himself/herself before an AIPAC that yields the power of life or death
for his/her candidacy?
Photographs of ordinary citizens holding
placards saying "we're sorry" to the offended, wherever else in the
world they may be, achieves little, if anything, but a weak expression
of guilt by a dozen or so peaceniks.
We need to do more. We need
to encourage academics like John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt whose
study of "The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy" exposes the
influence of lobbyists who represent only a tiny percentage of the
population.5
We need more media voices like Nicholas
Kristof's. Recently, in a somewhat surprising article - "Talking about
Israel" in the New York Times,. Kristof bemoans the fact that "There
is no serious political debate among either Democrats or Republicans
about our policy toward Israelis and Palestinians." His explanation:
American
politicians have learned to muzzle themselves. In the run-up to the
2004 Democratic primaries, Howard Dean said he favoured an even-handed
role for the U.S. - and was blasted for being hostile to Israel.
Likewise, Barack Obama has been scolded for daring to say: Nobody is
suffering more than the Palestinian people.6
We need to ask
our representatives and senators to address the issue of yielding to
lobby pressures. We represent much more than the 2 per cent who are
putting pressure on them. We need to let our representatives and
senators know that we're tired of being sorry throughout much of the
rest of the world.
We need to do more than tell the Arab world -
or anyone else - that were sorry. We need to return the US government
to the people. We need to do more than tell the Arab world -
or anyone else - that were sorry. We need to return the US government
to the people.
Notes
1. Hirschborn, Joel S, "Democracy Dreaming", Information Clearing House, 03/26/07
2. Penn, Sean, An Open Letter to the President...Four and a Half Years Later, The Huffington Post, 03/24/07
3. Soros, George, Israel, America and AIPAC, New York Review of Books, 04/12/07
4. Cole, Juan, "AIPAC's Overt and Covert Ops", AntiWar.com, 08/30/04
5. Mearsheimer & Walt, The Israeli Lobby and US Foreign Policy, London Review of Books, 03/23/06
6. Kristof, Nicholas J, op ed, New York Times 03/18/07