<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>University of British Columbia: Bringing Dark Matter to Light</title>
		<description>Comments for University of British Columbia: Bringing Dark Matter to Light at http://www.pacificfreepress.com , comment 1 to 1 out of 1 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.pacificfreepress.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 06:31:53 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Terminology</title>
			<link>http://www.pacificfreepress.com/news/1/2126-university-of-british-columbia-bringing-dark-matter-to-light.html#comment-1689</link>
			<description>Just a personal thing, but while I accept the effects shown to be taking place, the 'matter' of dark matter is a term that puts a strain on the acceptance. 'Force','energy'... 'gravity', strike me as easier to digest.
While matter possesses the characteristic called 'gravity', no particle has been discovered to be the source of that characteristic. (The gravitron is a hypothetical particle.) Giving 'matter' a broader definition by incorporating the characteristics of 'dark matter' in order to explain the impact is of what is being observed strikes me as the same thing as calling a lizard a mammal because it has four legs.

Thanks for the article. Not enough science in the world of reporting. - Steve</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 17:32:06 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
