Comments for Britain's Grayest Lady at http://pacificfreepress.com , comment 0 to 1 out of 1 comments http://pacificfreepress.com Fri, 29 Aug 2008 22:31:30 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.2 http://pacificfreepress.com/content/view/1805/81/#pc_1488 Accurate facts are very important to a writer's credibility with his or her audience. Writers should always remember the value of accurate research before publishing in order to avoid embarrassments of the written text. Here, the author discusses his distaste with the plan for Iraq, and in doing so, not only does his text completely associate two inherently different missions -- Psychological Operations and Civil Affairs, but the reader is also mislead to believe there is no distinction between the two components -- active duty and Reserve component. Conducting more thorough research would have lent itself nicely to www.news.soc.mil where fact sheets and information are available for the active-component missions while www.usacapoc.army.mil can further provide information about the Reserve-component missions. The story is very misleading in that it almost seems to label CA/PSYOP as scapegoats for "plan in Iraq," when in fact, this lack of support for the spearheaded mission of these two agencies and their mission is quite typical of the hasty and often times uninformed media culture of today. - a guest Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:17:33 +0100