Tora Tora Tora Time: Debt Ceiling War Goes Kamikaze

Share this post...

Submit to DiggSubmit to FacebookSubmit to Google PlusSubmit to StumbleuponSubmit to TwitterSubmit to LinkedIn
The War of the Kamikazes as the Debt Ceiling Debate Takes Center Stage and Appears Suicidal
by Danny Schechter l News Dissector
During World War 2, the Japanese deployed units of Kamikazi pilots who turned their planes into bombs, and sacrificed themselves in the name of their emperor in a holy war against US ships. They would aim for the deck of aircraft carriers and do as much damage as they could at a cost of their equipment and their lives.

Guerilla armies refined the tactic and made it less pricey. Much lower cost suicide belts with explosives are used by individuals to terrorize their enemies without having to sacrifice weapons systems.

Now, American politics has spawned its own kamikazes in the persona of ultra-right wing fanatics in suits who were ready to blow up the world financial system if they don’t get their way.
The use of the $14.3 debt ceiling was carefully calculated as a political weapon to terrorize financial institutions and governments by playing a game of their own version of apocalypse now. Concede to our political demands to shrink the government, no matter what the cost to the poor and or benefit dependent and even federal employees, or we will further destabilize the system. 
Our issues trump yours say these contemporary kamikazes because we have the votes. We don’t care of the nation defaults on its financial obligations. Take no prisoners is their approach; ‘Let it all fall apart’ is the threat, ‘our way or the highway’ is their mantra.

In response, the Administration has been offering what it calls “a grand bargain” which was off the table and is now back on after the they agreed to accept a short term debt ceiling hike. This approach, however, assures that this issue will stick around like a club to keep the battle going.

The new deal will allow for $4 trillion in budget cuts over the next decade. It will cut Medicare and Social Security in the name of “closing loopholes.”

The tension is overheating in a Washington drenched in the sweat of summer humidity. National Public Radio compares the discussions to a game of high stakes poker:

“If you remove the politics, the talking points and the media from the debt-ceiling showdown, you end up with something that looks like a high-stakes, no-limit Texas Hold ‘em poker game. You’ve got posturing, risk taking, betting and, of course, bluffing.”

“It’s a war zone. You can’t be a top-notch poker player without bluffing,” says Antonio Esfandiari, a champion poker player who has won millions at the tables.”

The Atlantic Wire reports: “ As the deadline approaches, both parties will start flexing less and compromising more…. According to The New York Times, the Republican hard-line stance on raising taxes is starting to splinter. Some have “appeared more willing to consider a deal locking in spending cuts that Mr. Obama has said he would take if balanced by new revenues.”

The relentless righteousness of the ideologically driven Tea Party backed ‘caucus of the crazy’ freaked out not just the President and the Democrats but many Republicans who, like them, depend on financing by Wall Street.

In a world of crashing currencies and defaults on the European horizon they don’t want the same here as trigger happy hardliners dictate to the country, and by extension the world.

Their political coup threatens to turn into an economic coup.

Wall Street is doing some political bombing of its own to get the GOP leadership to try to rein in their renegade factions out to please a base, which is, in turn, funded by the billionaire Koch brothers and others with self-interested agendas of their own.

Schoolyard bullies have nothing on these guys who have been holding the political debate hostage to their simplistic message points, which are then drilled into the nodding minds of their base over the years by the likes of the Fox Views Network and their rightwing radio brigade.

The politicians will keep dancing and prancing until the music stops.

Our fearless President who has rarely seen a compromise he won’t embrace is playing his usual double game, telling his supporters how firm he will be, and telling his avowed enemies he is willing to play in their pigpen if they would just be more “reasonable.”

The whole point of their exercise is to posture at not being reasonable, to maintain the appearance of a united front to get as much as they can by way of concessions and goodies for their own districts while lambasting all government spending.

New York Times points out that many of the Tea Party boosters on the hill are not shy about seeking government pork while they are blasting government excess,

“WASHINGTON — Freshman House Republicans who rode a wave of voter discontent into office last year vowed to stop out-of-control spending, but that has not stopped several of them from quietly trying to funnel millions of federal dollars into projects back home.”

Progressive Democrats are furious and smell betrayal. Here’s what MoveOn had to say:

??“Reports that the White House is negotiating a secret debt deal directly with House Republicans that could include deep cuts to Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security with limited or no immediate revenue increases are deeply troubling. Any deal that slashes programs for seniors and working families while doing nothing to make the rich and corporations pay their share is a total non-starter and Democrats in Congress should rule it out immediately.?

?“The Democratic base did not work night and day to elect Democrats so that they could cave to Tea Party extremists who are intent on gutting the social safety net millions of us fought to establish and protect.”

At the same time, Obama is following in Bill Clinton’s footsteps, according to former Labor Secretary Robert Reich:

“After a bruising midterm election, the president moves to the political center. He distances himself from his Democratic base. He calls for cuts in Social Security and signs historic legislation ending a major entitlement program. He agrees to balance the budget with major cuts in domestic discretionary spending. He has a showdown with Republicans who threaten to bring government to its knees if their budget demands aren’t met. He wins the showdown, successfully painting them as radicals. He goes on to win re-election.

Barack Obama in 2012? Maybe. But the president who actually did it was Bill Clinton.”

This debt issue has been calculated to focus attention on government as the fount of all evil, and distract attention away from out of control corporate enrichment, Wall Street crimes and looting in form of higher and higher CEO bonuses and greed driven compensation schemes.

A new poll shows public outrage at the government at their highest levels ever. (Some of this is fueled by the stalemate on the hill.)

This jihad on debt was hatched by right wing think tanks and the studies commissioned by billionaire Pete Peterson paint alarmist scenarios about the government going broke through a combination of reckless entitlement programs like Social Security and Medicare and runaway spending. There’s no mention of the amount wasted on wars or the debt that finances programs spawned by the Pentagon and the private sector that they believe can do no wrong.

It is in sharp contrast to the debt issue I explored in my 2006 film In Debt We Trust: America Before The Bubble Burst. I focused on mounting consumer debt and how it turned so many families into serfs, living to pay off high interest credit cards, crushing student loans and fraudulent sub prime mortgages.

Not only is this debt crisis that so many American feel deeply and personally not on the Republican agenda, but the kamikazes have fought successfully to neuter proposed reforms to protect consumers and have managed to force the Administration to abandon Harvard Professor Elizabeth Warren who led the fight for government agency to stop the abuses by banks and credit card companies.

These Republicans have no shame in weakening attempts to make the octopus of loan companies more transparent and less predatory.

Protecting people is not one of their priorities. Defending the privileged is.

While their narrative of negativity became dominant, progressives either became a cheering squad for corporate democrats or over focused on the machinations of the flamboyant Michelle Bachman’s, Sarah Palins and Glenn Becks.

They mostly reacted instead of acting.

They did not fight their narrative with another one attacking the economic powers in a crusade for justice. They watched as community organizations like ACORN were driven into the ground and only woke up when the Governor or Wisconsin went after the collective bargaining rights of unions.

Instead of organizing and united around campaigns based on program for substantive change, they went on the defensive designed to hold on existing rights instead of also fighting for new ones for all Americans.

As a result, the left has left itself out of this polarized political war even as the economy worsens while the media focuses on the clash of the gladiators in the hill. Reich reminds us these are not Clinton times:

“When the Great Recession wiped out $7.8 trillion of home values, it crushed the nest eggs and eliminated the collateral of America’s middle class. As a result, consumer spending has been decimated. Households have been forced to reduce their debt to 115% of disposable personal income from 130% in 2007, and there’s more to come. Household debt averaged 75% of personal income between 1975 and 2000.

We’re in a vicious cycle in which job and wage losses further reduce Americans’ willingness to spend, which further slows the economy. Job growth has effectively stopped. The fraction of the population now working (58.2%) is near a 25-year low—lower than it was when recession officially ended in June 2009.”

Who is talking about this disaster?

News Dissector Danny Schechter directed the DVD Plunder The Crime of Our Time to expose Wall Street Crimes. (
Comments to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

MORE, The Baseline Scenario Website: The Weirdness of 10-Year Deficit Reduction

By James Kwak

The Gang of Six plan proposes to reduce the cumulative deficit by $3.6-3.7 trillion over ten years relative to the CBO’s March 2011 baseline. Everyone’s excited about it. Four trillion dollars! Hooray!

The weird thing is that if you are claiming deficit reductions against the CBO’s baseline, I think intellectual honesty requires you to point out that, according to the CBO’s baseline, there is no deficit problem. The projected 2021 deficit is $729 billion, but net interest spending is $807 billion (Table 1-5). That means that the primary budget is running a surplus of $78 billion, the entire deficit is due to interest payments on the debt, and the debt has stabilized around 75 percent of GDP. This is not a great situation, but it’s no emergency, either.

Now, you may point out that the baseline is unrealistic, and I agree. But the three most unrealistic things in the baseline cancel themselves out. We know that Congress will continue to patch the AMT, which will cost $804 billion over ten years. (Numbers are from the CBO’s January Budget and Economic Outlook, Table 1-7; the baseline only changed minimally (and in a good way) between January and March.) We know that Congress will not let Medicare payment rates immediately fall by 28 percent; that costs $302 billion over ten years. But we also know that we are reducing military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, which will save $1,371 billion over ten years.* Add those three corrections, and the cumulative deficit is smaller than in the baseline by $265 billion.**

The big policy uncertainty that hangs over the ten-year baseline is the Bush and Obama tax cuts of 2001, 2003, and 2009, which were extended in December 2010 and now expire at the end of 2012. If we extend all of those tax cuts, we will add $612 billion to the 2021 deficit (on top of $137 billion for patching the AMT). That’s real money. To which my answer is: let them expire. Let all the tax cuts expire, and there is no ten-year deficit problem.

Instead, the Gang of Six plan proposes to cut taxes by $1.5 trillion (over ten years) relative to the CBO baseline — which means $1.5 trillion in unnecessary spending cuts.

The real problems come after the ten-year horizon, when Medicare spending accelerates due to an aging population and increasing health care costs. Those problems need to be solved sooner or later, and sooner is better than later, since every year of high health care cost inflation that goes by makes the problem worse. But the Gang of Six plan is the wrong way to solve those problems (although it is admittedly far better than the Ryan Plan, which only makes them worse). Does anyone really think that the middle class’s paltry 2001/2003 tax cuts will make up for a lower Social Security cost-of-living adjustment and a cap on federal health care spending?

* By statute, the CBO baseline must project military appropriations as a straight line based on past appropriations, so it assumes constant force levels for the next decade.

** The 2021 impact is even better: there you get a net $28 billion saving, which boosts the primary surplus to $106 billion.


Share this post...

Submit to DiggSubmit to FacebookSubmit to Google PlusSubmit to StumbleuponSubmit to TwitterSubmit to LinkedIn