Scholars at leading think tanks were more restrained, and some said there was a certain amount of literal truth to the essence of the reports. But they pointed out that while it included factual accuracy in a narrow sense, the assertion was out of context and had the potential to damage national unity at a time when the United States could ill afford such a disruption.
The claim evidently originated with a piece by a Lebanese journalist that appeared several days ago in a Beirut magazine. It was then picked up by a pair of left-leaning daily newspapers in London. From there, the story quickly made its way across the Atlantic via the Internet. â€œIt just goes to show how much we need seasoned, professional gatekeepers to separate the journalistic wheat from the chaff before it gains wide attention,â€ remarked the managing editor of one news program at a major U.S. television network. â€œThis is the kind of stuff you see on ideologically driven websites, but that hardly means it belongs on the evening news.â€ A newsmagazine editor agreed, calling the reports â€œthe worst kind of geographical correctness.â€
None of the major cable networks devoted much air time to reporting the story. At one outlet, a news executiveâ€™s memo told staffers that any reference to the controversy should include mention of the fact that the United States continues to lead the globe in scientific discoveries. At a more conservative network, anchors and correspondents reminded viewers that English is widely acknowledged to be the international language -- and more people speak English in the U.S. than in any other nation.
While government officials voiced acute skepticism about the notion that the United States is not the center of the world, they declined to speak for attribution. â€œIf lightning strikes and it turns out this report has real substance to it,â€ explained one policymaker at the State Department, â€œwe could look very bad, at least in the short run. Until it can be clearly refuted, no one wants to take the chance of leading with their chin and ending up with a hefty serving of Egg McMuffin on their face.â€
An informal survey of intellectuals with ties to influential magazines of political opinion, running the gamut from The Weekly Standard to The New Republic, indicated that the report was likely to gain little currency in Washingtonâ€™s elite media forums.
â€œThe problem with this kind of shoddy impersonation of reporting is that itâ€™s hard to knock down because there are grains of truth,â€ one editor commented. â€œSure, who doesnâ€™t know that our country includes only small percentages of the planetâ€™s land mass and population? But to draw an inference from those isolated facts that somehow the United States of America is not central to the world and its future -- well, that carries postmodernism to a nonsensical extreme.â€
Another well-known American journalist speculated that the controversy will soon pass: â€œMoral relativism remains a pernicious force in our society, but overall it holds less appeal than ever, even on American campuses. Itâ€™s not just that weâ€™re the only superpower -- we happen to also be the light onto the nations and the key to the worldâ€™s fate. People who canâ€™t accept that reality are not going to have much credibility.â€
Norman Solomonâ€™s book â€œWar Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Deathâ€ is out in paperback. For information, go to www.WarMadeEasy.com